Sundt Incident Report
This is the mandatory form that must be completed for incidents on Sundt projects.
Save responses as JSON
Print / Save as PDF
Expand all
Collapse all
Clear
1. Key Details
click to collapse/expand
BEFORE completing Incident Reports, you should take THIS training course (https://youtu.be/Wr7sI0qGoJI) . Edit your incident reports on mobile as follows: In-progress reports are located in the Compliance app's "To-Do List". Access and edit/update submitted reports with Safari or Chrome from the event list (refer to training (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1fYqDHezCM) , but via phone instead of computer when it comes to opening events at the 5:40 mark).
1. Primary Involved
List Radio
Select the party that contributed most/first to the accident. If subcontractor, select "Trade Contractor".
Member of the Public
Sundt Advanced Facilities
Sundt Building
Sundt Companies - Use this option for Sundt personnel whom are not assigned to a division/operating group.
Sundt Concrete
Sundt Equipment Services
Sundt Heavy Industrial and Mining
Sundt Industrial
Sundt Renewables
Sundt Transportation
Sundt Water and Wastewater
Third Party
Trade Contractor
Warehouse (Sundt)
2. Trade Contractor responsible for operation
Integrated list
3. Write in: If not listed, indicate the trade contractor responsible for the operation.
Text Short
4. Primary Incident Type
List Radio
Select the Incident Type based off of the sequence of events.
Auto/Motor Vehicle
Chemical Spill
Construction Equipment (non motor vehicle)
Crane
Injury - Work-related injuries https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1904/1904.5 (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1904/1904.5)
Inspection by Regulatory Agency
Near Miss - If no damage or injury occurred, but something physically happened that was unfavorable, the incident is considered a Near Miss.
Personal Medical Issue - NON work-related injury/illness
Property Damage (not utility related)
Sundt Driver Complaint
Theft
Utility Damage - Above/at/underground utility struck/grazed/damaged
Water Intrusion
5. Second Incident Type
List Radio
None - N/A
Auto/Motor Vehicle
Chemical Spill
Construction Equipment (non motor vehicle)
Crane
Inspection by Regulatory Agency
Near Miss - If no damage or injury occurred, but something physically happened that was unfavorable, the incident is considered a Near Miss.
Property Damage (not utility related)
Sundt Driver Complaint
Theft
Utility Damage - Above/at/underground utility struck/grazed/damaged
Water Intrusion
6. Third Incident Type
List Radio
None - N/A
Auto/Motor Vehicle
Chemical Spill
Construction Equipment (non motor vehicle)
Crane
Inspection by Regulatory Agency
Near Miss - If no damage or injury occurred, but something physically happened that was unfavorable, the incident is considered a Near Miss.
Property Damage (not utility related)
Sundt Driver Complaint
Theft
Utility Damage - Above/at/underground utility struck/grazed/damaged
Water Intrusion
7. Fourth Incident Type
List Radio
None - N/A
Auto/Motor Vehicle
Chemical Spill
Construction Equipment (non motor vehicle)
Crane
Inspection by Regulatory Agency
Near Miss - If no damage or injury occurred, but something physically happened that was unfavorable, the incident is considered a Near Miss.
Property Damage (not utility related)
Sundt Driver Complaint
Theft
Utility Damage - Above/at/underground utility struck/grazed/damaged
Water Intrusion
8. Incident Category
List Radio
Work Related
Not work related / not associated with project activity / For report only - Use this for incidents that occurred on personal time.
Driving on a public roadway
9. Purpose of travel
List Radio
Company business
Not business related
Commuting to/from work
10. Division of Work (scope being performed when incident occurred)
List Drop-down
What was the scope/division of work that caused/contributed to the incident? If a worker fell off a ladder while installing sheet metal flashing on a roof parapet, the appropriate division would be 05 Metals
Select...
0 Not related to a scope of work - N/A
00 TBD / Answer Pending
00 00 00 - General Conditions & General Requirements
02 00 00 - Existing Conditions
03 00 00 - Concrete
04 00 00 - Masonry
05 00 00 - Metals
06 00 00 - Wood, Plastics, and Composites
07 00 00 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
08 00 00 - Openings
09 00 00 - Finishes
10 00 00 - Specialties
11 00 00 - Equipment
12 00 00 - Furnishings
13 00 00 - Special Construction
14 00 00 - Conveying Equipment
21 00 00 - Fire Suppression
22 00 00 - Plumbing
23 00 00 - Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
25 50 00 - Integrated Automation Facility Controls
26 00 00 - Electrical
27 00 00 - Communications
28 00 00 - Electronic Safety & Security
31 00 00 - Earthwork
32 00 00 - Exterior Improvements
33 00 00 - Utilities
34 00 00 - Transportation
40 00 00 - Process Interconnections
41 00 00 - Material Processing & Handling Equipment
42 00 00 - Process Heating/Cooling/Drying Equipment
43 00 00 - Process Gas & Liquid Handling/Purification/Storage Equipment
44 00 00 - Pollution & Waste Control Equipment
45 00 00 - Industry-Specific Manufacturing Equipment
46 00 00 - Water & Wastewater Equipment
48 00 00 - Electrical Power Generation
11. Was the incident STCKY?
List Radio
Released STCKY energy contacted or came within six feet of personnel (or could have)
Yes
No
12. What primary STCKY Energy contributed to the incident?
List Radio
S#!t That's Built at Heights
S#!t That's Built in Confined Spaces
S#!t That's Built Underground
S#!t That's Energized
S#!t That's Hazardous
S#!t That Lifts
S#!t That Moves or Crushes
S#!t That Stores Energy
13. Date and Time Incident OCCURRED
Date time
14. Incident reported:
List Radio
(reported to Sundt project management)
Promptly reported - prompt = within a short, reasonable amount of time
Delayed report - delayed = more than half a work day since incident occurred
15. Reason for delay in reporting:
List Radio
Involved party delayed report to supervision
Supervision delayed report to Sundt project management
Other
16. Date and Time Incident REPORTED
Date time
17. Reason for delay in reporting
Text Short
18. Work Activity
List Radio
Scheduled
Unscheduled - not planned, no lookaheads, etc.
19. Work Type
List Radio
Initial work - first time scope performed/attempted
Ongoing Work - continuing operation of defined scope
Rework - fixing work already placed
Out-of-scope work - work that falls outside the initially defined scope of work
20. Activity Execution
List Radio
As planned per THA
Deviation from THA
No THA
THA not required
21. Time Type
List Radio
Regular Time / Working hours
Over Time
Non working hours
22. How many people were affected by or involved in this incident? - Not bystanders or witnesses
List Radio
0
1
2+
TBD / Answer Pending
23. How many different vehicles, pieces of equipment, or major pieces of property were damaged/stolen/involved?
List Radio
Not including cranes or utilities
0
1
2
3+
TBD / Answer Pending
24. How many different cranes were involved?
List Radio
1
2+
TBD / Answer Pending
25. How many different utilities were damaged?
List Radio
Not including cranes or utilities
0
1
2+
TBD / Answer Pending
26. How much chemical was spilled?
List Radio
Minor - more than incidental use
Major - government reporting required
TBD / Answer Pending
27. What chemical was spilled?
Text Short
28. WHERE incident occurred
Text Short
(NOT project)
29. Incident Description
Text Long
Describe how the incident occurred. Use this GPT for assistance. (https://chatgpt.com/g/g-nT7yZSd9i-ida) Ensure that for injuries, include where treatment was provided (on site, clinic, etc) and what the current work status is (returned to work to tolerance, placed on restricted duty, etc). DO NOT: make statements about how the incident could have been avoided retaliate against injured/affected persons repeat content already inputted thus far like date, time, location, etc.
2. Involved Party #1
click to collapse/expand
30. Party Type
List Radio
Sundt
Trade Contractor
Third Party
Other
31. Trade Contractor Company
Integrated list
32. Trade Contractor Employee Name
Text Short
33. Party's Name
Text Short
34. Sundt Employee Name
People
35. Write in if not listed: Sundt Employee Name
Text Short
36. Phone Number
Text
37. Shift Start Time
Time
38. Shift End Time
Time
39. Last Day Off from Work
Date
40. Was the THA reviewed in a language and manner the party proficiently understood?
List Radio
Yes
No
Unknown / TBD / N/A - or not applicable
41. Time with employer?
List Radio
Less than thirty days
Less than one year
More than one year
Unknown or TBD
42. Time on project?
List Radio
Less than one week
Less than 90 days
More than 90 days
Unknown or TBD
43. Was person working out of town / traveling?
List Radio
Yes
No
Unknown or TBD
44. Commute Length
List Radio
under 30 minutes
30 minutes - 1 hour
1-2 hours
over 2 hours
Unknown or TBD
45. Was required PPE worn?
List Radio
Yes
No
N/A, Unknown or TBD
46. What required PPE was missing?
List Checkbox
Fall protection
Glasses
Gloves
Goggles / Face Shield
Hard Hat
Hard hat chin strap
Hearing Protection
High Visibility Clothing
Respirator
Safety Shoes
Seatbelt
Other
Unknown or TBD
47. Other PPE NOT worn:
Text Short
48. Job Role
List Drop-down
Select...
Construction Management (all non-craft positions)
Carpenter
Dry Wall
Electrician
Equipment Services
Finisher
Fire Protection
Flooring
Iron Worker
Laborer
Landscaper
Masonry
Mechanic
Mechanical
Mill Worker
Operator
Painter
Pipe Fitter
Plumber
Rod Buster
Sheet Metal
Welder
49. Who was their supervisor at the time of incident?
People
50. Write in if not listed: Who was their supervisor at the time of incident?
Text Short
51. Was Party #1 injured?
List Radio
No injury
Yes, injury occurred
52. Reminder: If Sundt employee's injury is NOT life threatening, Occucare must be called ASAP: 866-268-0884
Text Label
3. Involved Party #1: Injury Details
click to collapse/expand
Input the more seriously injured party first (if multiple injured)
53. How many major/separate injuries does Party #1 have?
List Radio
1
2
3
54. Body Part Injured (#1)
List Multi-level
Input the most severe injury first
Head
Head, unspecified
Cranial region, including skull
Brain
Scalp
Skull
Multiple cranial region locations
Ear(s)
Face
Forehead
Eye(s)
Nose, nasal cavity
Nose, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Nasopharynx
Nasal passage(s)
Sinus(es)
Multiple internal nasal locations
Cheek(s)
Jaw, chin
Mouth
Lip(s)
Tongue
Tooth (teeth)
Gum
Multiple mouth locations
Multiple face locations
Multiple head locations
Neck, Including Throat
Neck, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Vocal cord(s)
Larynx
Laryngopharynx
Pharynx
Trachea
Multiple internal neck locations
Trunk
Chest, including ribs, internal organs
Chest, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Esophagus
Heart
Bronchus
Lung(s), pleura
Breast(s)—internal
Multiple internal chest locations
Back, including spine, spinal cord
Thoracic region
Lumbar region
Sacral region
Coccygeal region
Multiple back regions
Back, including spine, spinal cord, n.e.c.
Abdomen
Abdomen, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Stomach organ
Spleen
Urinary organs
Bladder
Kidney(s)
Multiple urinary organs
Intestines, peritoneum
Peritoneum
Small intestine
Large intestine, colon, rectum
Multiple intestinal locations
Other digestive structures
Liver
Gallbladder
Pancreas
Multiple other digestive structures
Multiple internal abdominal locations
Pelvic region
Pelvic region, unspecified
Hip(s)
Pelvis
Buttock(s)
Groin
External reproductive tract structures
Scrotum
Penis
External female genital region
Multiple external reproductive tract structures
Internal reproductive tract structures
Prostate
Testis (testes)
Ovary (ovaries)
Uterus
Multiple internal reproductive tract structures
Multiple pelvic region locations
Multiple trunk locations
Upper Extremities
Shoulder(s), including clavicle(s), scapula(e)
Arm(s)
Upper arm(s)
Elbow(s)
Forearm(s)
Multiple arm locations
Elbow(s) and arms(s)
Wrist(s)
Hand(s)
Hand(s), except finger(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s)
Fingernail(s), nailbed(s)
Fingertip(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.
Hand(s) and finger(s)
Hand(s), n.e.c.
Multiple upper extremities locations
Hand(s) and arms(s)
Hand(s) and elbow(s)
Hand(s) and wrist(s)
Wrist(s) and arm(s)
Wrist(s) and elbow(s)
Shoulder(s) and arm(s)
Lower Extremities
Leg(s)
Thigh(s)
Knee(s)
Lower leg(s)
Multiple leg locations
Knee(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s)
Foot (feet)
Top of Foot (feet)
Sole(s)
Sole(s), unspecified
Ball(s) of the foot
Arch(es), instep(s)
Heel(s)
Multiple sole locations
Toes(s), toenail(s)
Multiple foot (feet) locations
Multiple lower extremities locations
Foot (feet) and leg(s)
Foot(feet) and knee(s)
Foot (feet) and ankle(s)
Ankle(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s) and knee(s)
Body Systems
Multiple Body Parts
Head and neck
Head, neck, and trunk
Head and trunk
Neck and back
Shoulder(s) and back
Hip(s) and leg(s)
Upper and lower limb(s)
Whole body
Other Body Parts
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the head
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the trunk
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the upper extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the lower extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices involving multiple body parts
Nonclassifiable
Respiratory System
55. Injury Type (#1)
List Drop-down
Select...
Abrasion
Amputation
Asphyxia
Avulsion
Broken/chipped/cracked/fractured bones (including teeth)
Burn (Heat or Chemical)
Contusion (Bruise)
Dislocation
Electrical Shock
Fatality
Heat Exhaustion / Stroke
Hernia
Illness
Impalement
Inflammation
Laceration
Loss of Eye
Loss of Consciousness
Puncture/foreign object
Punctured Eardrum
Skin Irritation
Sprain / Strain
Other
56. Main Cause of Injury (#1)
List Multi-level
Contact with Objects & Equipment
Caught in
Caught between rolling powered vehicle and other object
Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects
Caught in running equipment or machinery
Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Compressed or pinched between two stationary objects
Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment
Engulfment in other collapsing material
Entangled in other object or equipment
Excavation or trenching cave-in
Landslide
Mine collapse or cave-in
Other cave-in
Contact
Contact with objects and equipment
Injured by handheld object or equipment
Injured by object breaking in hand
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by injured worker
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by other person
Rubbed or abraded by foreign matter in eye
Rubbed or abraded by friction or pressure
Rubbed or abraded by kneeling on surface
Rubbed or abraded by objects being handled
Rubbed or abraded by shoes, apparel, or accessories
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by other machine or equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vehicle or mobile equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vibration
Stepped on object
Struck against
Struck against moving object or equipment
Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment
Struck against object or equipment
Struck against object or equipment while moving it
Struck against stationary object or equipment
Struck against stationary object or equipment while rising
Struck by
Struck by discharged object or substance
Struck by discharged or flying object
Struck by dislodged flying object, particle
Struck by falling object or equipment
Struck by falling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by falling part of powered vehicle still attached
Struck by object falling from vehicle or machinery - other than vehicle part
Struck by object or equipment
Struck by object or equipment dropped by injured worker
Struck by object or equipment dropped by other person
Struck by object or equipment rolling freely
Struck by or caught in swinging door or gate
Struck by other falling powered vehicle
Struck by powered vehicle - nontransport
Struck by powered vehicle tipping over - nontransport
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle, unspecified
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by another person
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by injured worker
Struck by swinging or slipping object, other than handheld
Struck by swinging part of powered vehicle
Struck by thrown object - unintentional injury
Struck or run over by rolling powered vehicle
Struck, caught, or crushed in collapsing structure, equipment, or material
Struck, caught, or crushed in other collapsing structure or equipment
Exposure to Harmful Substances or Environments
Choking on object or substance
Contact with cold objects or substances
Contact with hot objects or substances
Depletion of oxygen
Direct exposure to electricity
Direct exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Direct exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Exposure through intact skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure through medical injection
Exposure through scratch or other open wound
Exposure through unintentional needlestick or sharp injury
Exposure to air and water pressure change
Exposure to change in air pressure
Exposure to change in water pressure
Exposure to electricity
Exposure to environmental cold
Exposure to environmental heat
Exposure to harmful substance through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure to light
Exposure to light and other radiation
Exposure to noise
Exposure to other harmful substance - multiple routes of exposure
Exposure to other harmful substances
Exposure to other radiation
Exposure to oxygen deficiency, unspecified
Exposure to radiation and noise
Exposure to temperature extremes
Indirect exposure to electricity
Indirect exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Indirect exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Ingestion of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance - multiple episodes
Inhalation of harmful substance - single episode
Multiple types of exposures through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Nonmedical use of drugs or alcohol - unintentional overdose
Repeated exposure to noise
Single, brief exposure to noise
Single, prolonged exposure to noise
Falls, Slips & Trips
Same level fall
Fall on same level due to slipping
Fall on same level due to tripping
Fall on same level due to tripping on uneven surface
Fall on same level due to tripping over an object
Fall on same level due to tripping over self
Fall on same level while climbing stairs, steps, or curbs
Lower level fall
Fall from collapsing structure or equipment
Fall or jump curtailed by personal fall arrest system
Fall through surface or existing opening
Jump from collapsing structure or equipment
Jumps to lower level
Other fall to lower level
Slip Trip
Slip on substance without fall
Slip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Slip or trip without fall
Trip from stepping into a hole without fall
Trip on uneven surface without fall
Trip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Trip over an object without fall
Trip over self without fall
Trip without fall
Same level fall
Fall while sitting
Fires & Explosions
Collapsing building, structure, or structural element during fire
Demolition or blasting explosion
Dust explosion
Explosion of nonpressurized vapors, gases, or liquids
Explosion of pressure vessel, piping, or tire
Explosions
Fires
Forest or brush fire
Ignition of clothing from controlled heat source
Ignition of vapors, gases, or liquids
Other structural fire without collapse
Small-scale (limited) fire
Vehicle or machinery fire
Overexertion & Bodily Reaction
Body positioning
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - repetitive or prolonged
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - single episode
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - repetitive or prolonged
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - single episode
Climbing or stepping up or down - repetitive or prolonged
Climbing or stepping up or down - single episode
Kneeling, kneeling down - repetitive or prolonged
Kneeling, kneeling down - single episode
Multiple types of exertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of overexertion involving outside sources
Multiple types of overexertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of repetitive motions
Overexertion
Other exertions or bodily reactions
Overexertion in catching - multiple episodes
Overexertion in catching - single episode
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - multiple episodes
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - single episode
Overexertion in lifting - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lifting - single episode
Overexertion in lifting, lowering
Overexertion in lowering - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lowering - single episode
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - multiple episodes
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - single episode
Overexertion in throwing - multiple episodes
Overexertion in throwing - single episode
Overexertion in throwing, catching
Overexertion involving outside sources
Repetitive grasping, placing, or moving objects, except tools
Repetitive motions involving microtasks
Repetitive use of hands, not involving tools
Repetitive use of tools, instruments
Running, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Running, without other incident - single episode
Sitting, sitting down - repetitive or prolonged
Sitting, sitting down - single episode
Standing, standing up - repetitive or prolonged
Standing, standing up - single episode
Sustained viewing
Typing, key entry, texting, or mousing
Walking, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Walking, without other incident - single episode
Transportation Incidents
Aircraft incidents
Bike or scooter incident
Collision between a moving and standing vehicle, nonroadway
Collision between rail vehicle and another vehicle
Derailment of a rail vehicle
Fall on rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from and struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, nonroadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, roadway
Moving in opposite directions, oncoming, nonroadway
Moving in same direction, nonroadway
Nonroadway collision with other vehicle
Nonroadway collisions with object other than vehicle
Nonroadway incidents involving motorized land vehicles
Nonroadway noncollision incident
Part of occupant body caught between vehicle and other object in nonroadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian vehicular incidents
Rail vehicle incidents
Ran off driving surface, nonroadway
Ran off roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle in roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle on side of roadway
Roadway collision - moving in opposite directions, oncoming
Roadway collision - moving in same direction
Roadway collision - moving perpendicularly
Roadway collision with object other than vehicle
Roadway collision with other vehicle
Roadway noncollision incident
Struck bump, hole, or rough terrain in road surface
Struck bump, hole, rough terrain on driving surface, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, roadway
Sudden start or stop, nonroadway
Sudden start or stop, roadway
Vehicle struck by falling or flying object - roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal in roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal on side of roadway
Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animals
Animal and insect related incidents
Bitten and or struck by animal
Drug overdose
Injury by other person - intentional
Injury by other person - unintentional or intent unknown
Nonvenomous stings and bites
Self-inflicted injury - intentional
Self-inflicted injury - unintentional or intent unknown
Venomous Stings and Bites
57. Body Part Injured (#2)
List Multi-level
Head
Head, unspecified
Cranial region, including skull
Brain
Scalp
Skull
Multiple cranial region locations
Ear(s)
Face
Forehead
Eye(s)
Nose, nasal cavity
Nose, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Nasopharynx
Nasal passage(s)
Sinus(es)
Multiple internal nasal locations
Cheek(s)
Jaw, chin
Mouth
Lip(s)
Tongue
Tooth (teeth)
Gum
Multiple mouth locations
Multiple face locations
Multiple head locations
Neck, Including Throat
Neck, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Vocal cord(s)
Larynx
Laryngopharynx
Pharynx
Trachea
Multiple internal neck locations
Trunk
Chest, including ribs, internal organs
Chest, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Esophagus
Heart
Bronchus
Lung(s), pleura
Breast(s)—internal
Multiple internal chest locations
Back, including spine, spinal cord
Thoracic region
Lumbar region
Sacral region
Coccygeal region
Multiple back regions
Back, including spine, spinal cord, n.e.c.
Abdomen
Abdomen, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Stomach organ
Spleen
Urinary organs
Bladder
Kidney(s)
Multiple urinary organs
Intestines, peritoneum
Peritoneum
Small intestine
Large intestine, colon, rectum
Multiple intestinal locations
Other digestive structures
Liver
Gallbladder
Pancreas
Multiple other digestive structures
Multiple internal abdominal locations
Pelvic region
Pelvic region, unspecified
Hip(s)
Pelvis
Buttock(s)
Groin
External reproductive tract structures
Scrotum
Penis
External female genital region
Multiple external reproductive tract structures
Internal reproductive tract structures
Prostate
Testis (testes)
Ovary (ovaries)
Uterus
Multiple internal reproductive tract structures
Multiple pelvic region locations
Multiple trunk locations
Upper Extremities
Shoulder(s), including clavicle(s), scapula(e)
Arm(s)
Upper arm(s)
Elbow(s)
Forearm(s)
Multiple arm locations
Elbow(s) and arms(s)
Wrist(s)
Hand(s)
Hand(s), except finger(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s)
Fingernail(s), nailbed(s)
Fingertip(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.
Hand(s) and finger(s)
Hand(s), n.e.c.
Multiple upper extremities locations
Hand(s) and arms(s)
Hand(s) and elbow(s)
Hand(s) and wrist(s)
Wrist(s) and arm(s)
Wrist(s) and elbow(s)
Shoulder(s) and arm(s)
Lower Extremities
Leg(s)
Thigh(s)
Knee(s)
Lower leg(s)
Multiple leg locations
Knee(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s)
Foot (feet)
Top of Foot (feet)
Sole(s)
Sole(s), unspecified
Ball(s) of the foot
Arch(es), instep(s)
Heel(s)
Multiple sole locations
Toes(s), toenail(s)
Multiple foot (feet) locations
Multiple lower extremities locations
Foot (feet) and leg(s)
Foot(feet) and knee(s)
Foot (feet) and ankle(s)
Ankle(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s) and knee(s)
Body Systems
Multiple Body Parts
Head and neck
Head, neck, and trunk
Head and trunk
Neck and back
Shoulder(s) and back
Hip(s) and leg(s)
Upper and lower limb(s)
Other multiple body parts
Whole body
Other Body Parts
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the head
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the trunk
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the upper extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the lower extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices involving multiple body parts
Nonclassifiable
Respiratory System
58. Injury Type (#2)
List Drop-down
Select...
Abrasion
Amputation
Asphyxia
Avulsion
Broken/chipped/cracked/fractured bones (including teeth)
Burn (Heat or Chemical)
Contusion (Bruise)
Dislocation
Electrical Shock
Fatality
Heat Exhaustion / Stroke
Hernia
Illness
Impalement
Inflammation
Laceration
Loss of Eye
Loss of Consciousness
Puncture/foreign object
Punctured Eardrum
Skin Irritation
Sprain / Strain
Other
59. Main Cause of Injury (#2)
List Multi-level
Contact with Objects & Equipment
Caught in
Caught between rolling powered vehicle and other object
Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects
Caught in running equipment or machinery
Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Compressed or pinched between two stationary objects
Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment
Engulfment in other collapsing material
Entangled in other object or equipment
Excavation or trenching cave-in
Landslide
Mine collapse or cave-in
Other cave-in
Contact
Contact with objects and equipment
Injured by handheld object or equipment
Injured by object breaking in hand
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by injured worker
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by other person
Rubbed or abraded by foreign matter in eye
Rubbed or abraded by friction or pressure
Rubbed or abraded by kneeling on surface
Rubbed or abraded by objects being handled
Rubbed or abraded by shoes, apparel, or accessories
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by other machine or equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vehicle or mobile equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vibration
Stepped on object
Struck against
Struck against moving object or equipment
Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment
Struck against object or equipment
Struck against object or equipment while moving it
Struck against stationary object or equipment
Struck against stationary object or equipment while rising
Struck by
Struck by discharged object or substance
Struck by discharged or flying object
Struck by dislodged flying object, particle
Struck by falling object or equipment
Struck by falling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by falling part of powered vehicle still attached
Struck by object falling from vehicle or machinery - other than vehicle part
Struck by object or equipment
Struck by object or equipment dropped by injured worker
Struck by object or equipment dropped by other person
Struck by object or equipment rolling freely
Struck by or caught in swinging door or gate
Struck by other falling powered vehicle
Struck by powered vehicle - nontransport
Struck by powered vehicle tipping over - nontransport
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle, unspecified
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by another person
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by injured worker
Struck by swinging or slipping object, other than handheld
Struck by swinging part of powered vehicle
Struck by thrown object - unintentional injury
Struck or run over by rolling powered vehicle
Struck, caught, or crushed in collapsing structure, equipment, or material
Struck, caught, or crushed in other collapsing structure or equipment
Exposure to Harmful Substances or Environments
Choking on object or substance
Contact with cold objects or substances
Contact with hot objects or substances
Depletion of oxygen
Direct exposure to electricity
Direct exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Direct exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Exposure through intact skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure through medical injection
Exposure through scratch or other open wound
Exposure through unintentional needlestick or sharp injury
Exposure to air and water pressure change
Exposure to change in air pressure
Exposure to change in water pressure
Exposure to electricity
Exposure to environmental cold
Exposure to environmental heat
Exposure to harmful substance through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure to light
Exposure to light and other radiation
Exposure to noise
Exposure to other harmful substance - multiple routes of exposure
Exposure to other harmful substances
Exposure to other radiation
Exposure to oxygen deficiency, unspecified
Exposure to radiation and noise
Exposure to temperature extremes
Indirect exposure to electricity
Indirect exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Indirect exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Ingestion of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance - multiple episodes
Inhalation of harmful substance - single episode
Multiple types of exposures through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Nonmedical use of drugs or alcohol - unintentional overdose
Repeated exposure to noise
Single, brief exposure to noise
Single, prolonged exposure to noise
Falls, Slips & Trips
Same level fall
Fall on same level due to slipping
Fall on same level due to tripping
Fall on same level due to tripping on uneven surface
Fall on same level due to tripping over an object
Fall on same level due to tripping over self
Fall on same level while climbing stairs, steps, or curbs
Lower level fall
Fall from collapsing structure or equipment
Fall or jump curtailed by personal fall arrest system
Fall through surface or existing opening
Jump from collapsing structure or equipment
Jumps to lower level
Other fall to lower level
Slip Trip
Slip on substance without fall
Slip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Slip or trip without fall
Trip from stepping into a hole without fall
Trip on uneven surface without fall
Trip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Trip over an object without fall
Trip over self without fall
Trip without fall
Same level fall
Fall while sitting
Fires & Explosions
Collapsing building, structure, or structural element during fire
Demolition or blasting explosion
Dust explosion
Explosion of nonpressurized vapors, gases, or liquids
Explosion of pressure vessel, piping, or tire
Explosions
Fires
Forest or brush fire
Ignition of clothing from controlled heat source
Ignition of vapors, gases, or liquids
Other structural fire without collapse
Small-scale (limited) fire
Vehicle or machinery fire
Overexertion & Bodily Reaction
Body positioning
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - repetitive or prolonged
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - single episode
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - repetitive or prolonged
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - single episode
Climbing or stepping up or down - repetitive or prolonged
Climbing or stepping up or down - single episode
Kneeling, kneeling down - repetitive or prolonged
Kneeling, kneeling down - single episode
Multiple types of exertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of overexertion involving outside sources
Multiple types of overexertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of repetitive motions
Overexertion
Other exertions or bodily reactions
Overexertion in catching - multiple episodes
Overexertion in catching - single episode
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - multiple episodes
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - single episode
Overexertion in lifting - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lifting - single episode
Overexertion in lifting, lowering
Overexertion in lowering - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lowering - single episode
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - multiple episodes
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - single episode
Overexertion in throwing - multiple episodes
Overexertion in throwing - single episode
Overexertion in throwing, catching
Overexertion involving outside sources
Repetitive grasping, placing, or moving objects, except tools
Repetitive motions involving microtasks
Repetitive use of hands, not involving tools
Repetitive use of tools, instruments
Running, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Running, without other incident - single episode
Sitting, sitting down - repetitive or prolonged
Sitting, sitting down - single episode
Standing, standing up - repetitive or prolonged
Standing, standing up - single episode
Sustained viewing
Typing, key entry, texting, or mousing
Walking, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Walking, without other incident - single episode
Transportation Incidents
Aircraft incidents
Bike or scooter incident
Collision between a moving and standing vehicle, nonroadway
Collision between rail vehicle and another vehicle
Derailment of a rail vehicle
Fall on rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from and struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, nonroadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, roadway
Moving in opposite directions, oncoming, nonroadway
Moving in same direction, nonroadway
Nonroadway collision with other vehicle
Nonroadway collisions with object other than vehicle
Nonroadway incidents involving motorized land vehicles
Nonroadway noncollision incident
Part of occupant body caught between vehicle and other object in nonroadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian vehicular incidents
Rail vehicle incidents
Ran off driving surface, nonroadway
Ran off roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle in roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle on side of roadway
Roadway collision - moving in opposite directions, oncoming
Roadway collision - moving in same direction
Roadway collision - moving perpendicularly
Roadway collision with object other than vehicle
Roadway collision with other vehicle
Roadway noncollision incident
Struck bump, hole, or rough terrain in road surface
Struck bump, hole, rough terrain on driving surface, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, roadway
Sudden start or stop, nonroadway
Sudden start or stop, roadway
Vehicle struck by falling or flying object - roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal in roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal on side of roadway
Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animals
Animal and insect related incidents
Bitten and or struck by animal
Drug overdose
Injury by other person - intentional
Injury by other person - unintentional or intent unknown
Nonvenomous stings and bites
Self-inflicted injury - intentional
Self-inflicted injury - unintentional or intent unknown
Venomous Stings and Bites
60. Body Part Injured (#3)
List Multi-level
Head
Head, unspecified
Cranial region, including skull
Brain
Scalp
Skull
Multiple cranial region locations
Ear(s)
Face
Forehead
Eye(s)
Nose, nasal cavity
Nose, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Nasopharynx
Nasal passage(s)
Sinus(es)
Multiple internal nasal locations
Cheek(s)
Jaw, chin
Mouth
Lip(s)
Tongue
Tooth (teeth)
Gum
Multiple mouth locations
Multiple face locations
Multiple head locations
Neck, Including Throat
Neck, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Vocal cord(s)
Larynx
Laryngopharynx
Pharynx
Trachea
Multiple internal neck locations
Trunk
Chest, including ribs, internal organs
Chest, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Esophagus
Heart
Bronchus
Lung(s), pleura
Breast(s)—internal
Multiple internal chest locations
Back, including spine, spinal cord
Thoracic region
Lumbar region
Sacral region
Coccygeal region
Multiple back regions
Back, including spine, spinal cord, n.e.c.
Abdomen
Abdomen, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Stomach organ
Spleen
Urinary organs
Bladder
Kidney(s)
Multiple urinary organs
Intestines, peritoneum
Peritoneum
Small intestine
Large intestine, colon, rectum
Multiple intestinal locations
Other digestive structures
Liver
Gallbladder
Pancreas
Multiple other digestive structures
Multiple internal abdominal locations
Pelvic region
Pelvic region, unspecified
Hip(s)
Pelvis
Buttock(s)
Groin
External reproductive tract structures
Scrotum
Penis
External female genital region
Multiple external reproductive tract structures
Internal reproductive tract structures
Prostate
Testis (testes)
Ovary (ovaries)
Uterus
Multiple internal reproductive tract structures
Multiple pelvic region locations
Multiple trunk locations
Upper Extremities
Shoulder(s), including clavicle(s), scapula(e)
Arm(s)
Upper arm(s)
Elbow(s)
Forearm(s)
Multiple arm locations
Elbow(s) and arms(s)
Wrist(s)
Hand(s)
Hand(s), except finger(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s)
Fingernail(s), nailbed(s)
Fingertip(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.
Hand(s) and finger(s)
Hand(s), n.e.c.
Multiple upper extremities locations
Hand(s) and arms(s)
Hand(s) and elbow(s)
Hand(s) and wrist(s)
Wrist(s) and arm(s)
Wrist(s) and elbow(s)
Shoulder(s) and arm(s)
Lower Extremities
Leg(s)
Thigh(s)
Knee(s)
Lower leg(s)
Multiple leg locations
Knee(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s)
Foot (feet)
Top of Foot (feet)
Sole(s)
Sole(s), unspecified
Ball(s) of the foot
Arch(es), instep(s)
Heel(s)
Multiple sole locations
Toes(s), toenail(s)
Multiple foot (feet) locations
Multiple lower extremities locations
Foot (feet) and leg(s)
Foot(feet) and knee(s)
Foot (feet) and ankle(s)
Ankle(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s) and knee(s)
Body Systems
Multiple Body Parts
Head and neck
Head, neck, and trunk
Head and trunk
Neck and back
Shoulder(s) and back
Hip(s) and leg(s)
Upper and lower limb(s)
Other multiple body parts
Whole body
Other Body Parts
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the head
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the trunk
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the upper extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the lower extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices involving multiple body parts
Nonclassifiable
Respiratory System
61. Injury Type (#3)
List Drop-down
Select...
Abrasion
Amputation
Asphyxia
Avulsion
Broken/chipped/cracked/fractured bones (including teeth)
Burn (Heat or Chemical)
Contusion (Bruise)
Dislocation
Electrical Shock
Fatality
Heat Exhaustion / Stroke
Hernia
Illness
Impalement
Inflammation
Laceration
Loss of Eye
Loss of Consciousness
Puncture/foreign object
Punctured Eardrum
Skin Irritation
Sprain / Strain
Other
62. Main Cause of Injury (#3)
List Multi-level
Contact with Objects & Equipment
Caught in
Caught between rolling powered vehicle and other object
Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects
Caught in running equipment or machinery
Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Compressed or pinched between two stationary objects
Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment
Engulfment in other collapsing material
Entangled in other object or equipment
Excavation or trenching cave-in
Landslide
Mine collapse or cave-in
Other cave-in
Contact
Contact with objects and equipment
Injured by handheld object or equipment
Injured by object breaking in hand
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by injured worker
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by other person
Rubbed or abraded by foreign matter in eye
Rubbed or abraded by friction or pressure
Rubbed or abraded by kneeling on surface
Rubbed or abraded by objects being handled
Rubbed or abraded by shoes, apparel, or accessories
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by other machine or equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vehicle or mobile equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vibration
Stepped on object
Struck against
Struck against moving object or equipment
Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment
Struck against object or equipment
Struck against object or equipment while moving it
Struck against stationary object or equipment
Struck against stationary object or equipment while rising
Struck by
Struck by discharged object or substance
Struck by discharged or flying object
Struck by dislodged flying object, particle
Struck by falling object or equipment
Struck by falling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by falling part of powered vehicle still attached
Struck by object falling from vehicle or machinery - other than vehicle part
Struck by object or equipment
Struck by object or equipment dropped by injured worker
Struck by object or equipment dropped by other person
Struck by object or equipment rolling freely
Struck by or caught in swinging door or gate
Struck by other falling powered vehicle
Struck by powered vehicle - nontransport
Struck by powered vehicle tipping over - nontransport
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle, unspecified
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by another person
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by injured worker
Struck by swinging or slipping object, other than handheld
Struck by swinging part of powered vehicle
Struck by thrown object - unintentional injury
Struck or run over by rolling powered vehicle
Struck, caught, or crushed in collapsing structure, equipment, or material
Struck, caught, or crushed in other collapsing structure or equipment
Exposure to Harmful Substances or Environments
Choking on object or substance
Contact with cold objects or substances
Contact with hot objects or substances
Depletion of oxygen
Direct exposure to electricity
Direct exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Direct exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Exposure through intact skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure through medical injection
Exposure through scratch or other open wound
Exposure through unintentional needlestick or sharp injury
Exposure to air and water pressure change
Exposure to change in air pressure
Exposure to change in water pressure
Exposure to electricity
Exposure to environmental cold
Exposure to environmental heat
Exposure to harmful substance through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure to light
Exposure to light and other radiation
Exposure to noise
Exposure to other harmful substance - multiple routes of exposure
Exposure to other harmful substances
Exposure to other radiation
Exposure to oxygen deficiency, unspecified
Exposure to radiation and noise
Exposure to temperature extremes
Indirect exposure to electricity
Indirect exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Indirect exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Ingestion of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance - multiple episodes
Inhalation of harmful substance - single episode
Multiple types of exposures through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Nonmedical use of drugs or alcohol - unintentional overdose
Repeated exposure to noise
Single, brief exposure to noise
Single, prolonged exposure to noise
Falls, Slips & Trips
Same level fall
Fall on same level due to slipping
Fall on same level due to tripping
Fall on same level due to tripping on uneven surface
Fall on same level due to tripping over an object
Fall on same level due to tripping over self
Fall on same level while climbing stairs, steps, or curbs
Lower level fall
Fall from collapsing structure or equipment
Fall or jump curtailed by personal fall arrest system
Fall through surface or existing opening
Jump from collapsing structure or equipment
Jumps to lower level
Other fall to lower level
Slip Trip
Slip on substance without fall
Slip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Slip or trip without fall
Trip from stepping into a hole without fall
Trip on uneven surface without fall
Trip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Trip over an object without fall
Trip over self without fall
Trip without fall
Same level fall
Fall while sitting
Fires & Explosions
Collapsing building, structure, or structural element during fire
Demolition or blasting explosion
Dust explosion
Explosion of nonpressurized vapors, gases, or liquids
Explosion of pressure vessel, piping, or tire
Explosions
Fires
Forest or brush fire
Ignition of clothing from controlled heat source
Ignition of vapors, gases, or liquids
Other structural fire without collapse
Small-scale (limited) fire
Vehicle or machinery fire
Overexertion & Bodily Reaction
Body positioning
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - repetitive or prolonged
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - single episode
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - repetitive or prolonged
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - single episode
Climbing or stepping up or down - repetitive or prolonged
Climbing or stepping up or down - single episode
Kneeling, kneeling down - repetitive or prolonged
Kneeling, kneeling down - single episode
Multiple types of exertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of overexertion involving outside sources
Multiple types of overexertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of repetitive motions
Overexertion
Other exertions or bodily reactions
Overexertion in catching - multiple episodes
Overexertion in catching - single episode
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - multiple episodes
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - single episode
Overexertion in lifting - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lifting - single episode
Overexertion in lifting, lowering
Overexertion in lowering - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lowering - single episode
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - multiple episodes
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - single episode
Overexertion in throwing - multiple episodes
Overexertion in throwing - single episode
Overexertion in throwing, catching
Overexertion involving outside sources
Repetitive grasping, placing, or moving objects, except tools
Repetitive motions involving microtasks
Repetitive use of hands, not involving tools
Repetitive use of tools, instruments
Running, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Running, without other incident - single episode
Sitting, sitting down - repetitive or prolonged
Sitting, sitting down - single episode
Standing, standing up - repetitive or prolonged
Standing, standing up - single episode
Sustained viewing
Typing, key entry, texting, or mousing
Walking, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Walking, without other incident - single episode
Transportation Incidents
Aircraft incidents
Bike or scooter incident
Collision between a moving and standing vehicle, nonroadway
Collision between rail vehicle and another vehicle
Derailment of a rail vehicle
Fall on rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from and struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, nonroadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, roadway
Moving in opposite directions, oncoming, nonroadway
Moving in same direction, nonroadway
Nonroadway collision with other vehicle
Nonroadway collisions with object other than vehicle
Nonroadway incidents involving motorized land vehicles
Nonroadway noncollision incident
Part of occupant body caught between vehicle and other object in nonroadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian vehicular incidents
Rail vehicle incidents
Ran off driving surface, nonroadway
Ran off roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle in roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle on side of roadway
Roadway collision - moving in opposite directions, oncoming
Roadway collision - moving in same direction
Roadway collision - moving perpendicularly
Roadway collision with object other than vehicle
Roadway collision with other vehicle
Roadway noncollision incident
Struck bump, hole, or rough terrain in road surface
Struck bump, hole, rough terrain on driving surface, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, roadway
Sudden start or stop, nonroadway
Sudden start or stop, roadway
Vehicle struck by falling or flying object - roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal in roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal on side of roadway
Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animals
Animal and insect related incidents
Bitten and or struck by animal
Drug overdose
Injury by other person - intentional
Injury by other person - unintentional or intent unknown
Nonvenomous stings and bites
Self-inflicted injury - intentional
Self-inflicted injury - unintentional or intent unknown
Venomous Stings and Bites
63. Treatment Classification
List Radio
Jobsite Treatment
Offsite Medical Treatment
Treatment declined by injured party
64. Medical Treatment Provider
List Radio
REMEMBER TO CALL OCCUCARE FIRST FOR NON EMERGENCY INJURIES INVOLVING SUNDT PERSONNEL 866-268-0884
Occupational Health Clinic
Hospital / Emergency Room / EMS (911)
After Hours / Urgent Care
65. First Aid Provider
List Radio
Occucare
Jobsite First Aid Provider (i.e. Project Site Nurse, etc.)
Project personnel
Self administered
66. Treatment Outcome
List Radio
STCKY Injury - Select SIF criteria from the box below.
First Aid
Restricted Duty
Days Away from work / Lost Time
Other Recordable Criteria - Other Recordable Criteria = prescriptions, therapy, etc., Anything other than Restricted Duty or Lost Time
STCKY Injury - STCKY Injury - Life Threatening (LT) - Worker would not survive without medical intervention
67. STCKY Injury - SIF Criteria
List Radio
Fatality
Amputations (involving bone) excludes distal phalanx
Head trauma that results in a traumatic brain injury (TBI)
Injury or trauma to vital organs
Bone fractures requiring surgery for repair, excluding fingers and toes
Acute traumatic herniated disc with neurologic deficit
3rd degree burn requiring skin graft
Eye injuries resulting in permanent vision loss or change in vision
High pressure injection injuries requiring surgical debridement and irrigation
Heat Stroke – Medically diagnosed
Electrical Contact Injury – Resulting in life-threatening cardiac, neurological, or burn injuries requiring emergency or hospital-level care
Vascular trauma requiring surgery
Acute chemical or radiological exposure resulting in injury to vital organs
Other Injuries
68. Injury Classification: First Aid
Text Label
69. Injury Classification: Recordable
Text Label
70. Does this injury require reporting per "1904 Subpart E - Reporting Fatality, Injury and Illness Information to the Government"?
Choice
All employers are required to notify OSHA when an employee is killed on the job or suffers a work-related hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye. A fatality must be reported within 8 hours. An in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or eye loss must be reported within 24 hours. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1904/1904.39 (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1904/1904.39)
Yes
No
71. Clinic Hospital Name
Text Short
72. Clinic Hospital Address
Text Short
73. Clinic Hospital Phone Number
Text Short
74. First day of lost time
Date
75. Has lost time ended?
List Radio
Yes, returned to regular duty
Yes, returned to modified duty
Yes, employee was terminated
No, employee is currently on lost time
76. First day of modified duty
Date
77. Date returned to modified duty
Date
78. Date returned to regular work
Date
79. Employment Termination Date
Date
80. Miscellaneous Injury Notes / Other Recordable Criteria:
Text Short
81. Employee Number
Text Short
Input a single 0 if employee number cannot be obtained
82. Date of Birth
Date
Input date of 1/1/1911 if unknown
83. Date of Hire
Date
84. Current, Physical Address (Street name & number, city, state, zip)
Text Short
85. Hourly Wage
Number
Input 1 if unknown
86. Side of Body Injured
List Radio
Right
Left
Both
87. Gender
List Radio
Male
Female
88. Name of physician or healthcare professional
Text Short
89. Was employee hospitalized overnight as an in-patient?
List Radio
Yes
No
90. What was the employee doing just before the incident occurred?
Text Short
91. If the employee died, when did death occur?
Date time
4. Involved Party #2
click to collapse/expand
92. Party Type
List Radio
Sundt
Trade Contractor
Third Party
Other
93. Trade Contractor Company
Integrated list
94. Trade Contractor Employee Name
Text Short
95. Party's Name
Text Short
96. Sundt Employee Name
People
97. Write in if not listed: Sundt Employee Name
Text Short
98. Phone Number
Text
99. Shift Start Time
Time
100. Shift End Time
Time
101. Last Day Off from Work
Date
102. Was the THA reviewed in a language and manner the party proficiently understood?
List Radio
Yes
No
Unknown or TBD - or Not Applicable
103. Time with employer?
List Radio
Less than thirty days
Less than one year
More than one year
Unknown or TBD
104. Time on project?
List Radio
Less than one week
Less than 90 days
More than 90 days
Unknown or TBD
105. Was person on subsistence?
List Radio
Yes
No
Unknown or TBD
106. Commute Length
List Radio
under 30 minutes
30 minutes - 1 hour
1-2 hours
over 2 hours
Unknown or TBD
107. Was required PPE worn?
List Radio
Yes
No
N/A, Unknown, or TBD
108. What required PPE was missing?
List Checkbox
Fall protection
Glasses
Gloves
Goggles / Face Shield
Hard Hat
Hard hat chin strap
Hearing Protection
High Visibility Clothing
Respirator
Safety Shoes
Seatbelt
Other
Unknown or TBD
109. Other PPE NOT worn:
Text Short
110. Job Role
List Drop-down
Select...
Construction Management (all non-craft positions)
Carpenter
Dry Wall
Electrician
Equipment Services
Finisher
Fire Protection
Flooring
Iron Worker
Laborer
Landscaper
Masonry
Mechanic
Mechanical
Mill Worker
Operator
Painter
Pipe Fitter
Plumber
Rod Buster
Sheet Metal
Welder
111. Who was their supervisor at the time of incident?
People
112. Write in if not listed: Who was their supervisor at the time of incident?
Text Short
113. Was Party #2 injured?
List Radio
No injury
Yes, injury occurred
114. Reminder: If Sundt employee's injury is NOT life threatening, Occucare must be called ASAP: 866-268-0884
Text Label
5. Involved Party #2: Injury Details
click to collapse/expand
115. How many major/separate injuries does Party #2 have?
List Radio
1
2
3
116. Body Part Injured (#1)
List Multi-level
Head
Head, unspecified
Cranial region, including skull
Brain
Scalp
Skull
Multiple cranial region locations
Ear(s)
Face
Forehead
Eye(s)
Nose, nasal cavity
Nose, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Nasopharynx
Nasal passage(s)
Sinus(es)
Multiple internal nasal locations
Cheek(s)
Jaw, chin
Mouth
Lip(s)
Tongue
Tooth (teeth)
Gum
Multiple mouth locations
Multiple face locations
Multiple head locations
Neck, Including Throat
Neck, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Vocal cord(s)
Larynx
Laryngopharynx
Pharynx
Trachea
Multiple internal neck locations
Trunk
Chest, including ribs, internal organs
Chest, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Esophagus
Heart
Bronchus
Lung(s), pleura
Breast(s)—internal
Multiple internal chest locations
Back, including spine, spinal cord
Thoracic region
Lumbar region
Sacral region
Coccygeal region
Multiple back regions
Back, including spine, spinal cord, n.e.c.
Abdomen
Abdomen, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Stomach organ
Spleen
Urinary organs
Bladder
Kidney(s)
Multiple urinary organs
Intestines, peritoneum
Peritoneum
Small intestine
Large intestine, colon, rectum
Multiple intestinal locations
Other digestive structures
Liver
Gallbladder
Pancreas
Multiple other digestive structures
Multiple internal abdominal locations
Pelvic region
Pelvic region, unspecified
Hip(s)
Pelvis
Buttock(s)
Groin
External reproductive tract structures
Scrotum
Penis
External female genital region
Multiple external reproductive tract structures
Internal reproductive tract structures
Prostate
Testis (testes)
Ovary (ovaries)
Uterus
Multiple internal reproductive tract structures
Multiple pelvic region locations
Multiple trunk locations
Upper Extremities
Shoulder(s), including clavicle(s), scapula(e)
Arm(s)
Upper arm(s)
Elbow(s)
Forearm(s)
Multiple arm locations
Elbow(s) and arms(s)
Wrist(s)
Hand(s)
Hand(s), except finger(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s)
Fingernail(s), nailbed(s)
Fingertip(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.
Hand(s) and finger(s)
Hand(s), n.e.c.
Multiple upper extremities locations
Hand(s) and arms(s)
Hand(s) and elbow(s)
Hand(s) and wrist(s)
Wrist(s) and arm(s)
Wrist(s) and elbow(s)
Shoulder(s) and arm(s)
Lower Extremities
Leg(s)
Thigh(s)
Knee(s)
Lower leg(s)
Multiple leg locations
Knee(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s)
Foot (feet)
Top of Foot (feet)
Sole(s)
Sole(s), unspecified
Ball(s) of the foot
Arch(es), instep(s)
Heel(s)
Multiple sole locations
Toes(s), toenail(s)
Multiple foot (feet) locations
Multiple lower extremities locations
Foot (feet) and leg(s)
Foot(feet) and knee(s)
Foot (feet) and ankle(s)
Ankle(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s) and knee(s)
Body Systems
Multiple Body Parts
Head and neck
Head, neck, and trunk
Head and trunk
Neck and back
Shoulder(s) and back
Hip(s) and leg(s)
Upper and lower limb(s)
Whole body
Other Body Parts
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the head
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the trunk
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the upper extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the lower extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices involving multiple body parts
Nonclassifiable
Respiratory System
117. Injury Type (#1)
List Drop-down
Select...
Abrasion
Amputation
Asphyxia
Avulsion
Broken/chipped/cracked/fractured bones (including teeth)
Burn (Heat or Chemical)
Contusion (Bruise)
Dislocation
Electrical Shock
Fatality
Heat Exhaustion / Stroke
Hernia
Illness
Impalement
Inflammation
Laceration
Loss of Eye
Loss of Consciousness
Puncture/foreign object
Punctured Eardrum
Skin Irritation
Sprain / Strain
Other
118. Main Cause of Injury (#1)
List Multi-level
Contact with Objects & Equipment
Caught in
Caught between rolling powered vehicle and other object
Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects
Caught in running equipment or machinery
Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Compressed or pinched between two stationary objects
Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment
Engulfment in other collapsing material
Entangled in other object or equipment
Excavation or trenching cave-in
Landslide
Mine collapse or cave-in
Other cave-in
Contact
Contact with objects and equipment
Injured by handheld object or equipment
Injured by object breaking in hand
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by injured worker
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by other person
Rubbed or abraded by foreign matter in eye
Rubbed or abraded by friction or pressure
Rubbed or abraded by kneeling on surface
Rubbed or abraded by objects being handled
Rubbed or abraded by shoes, apparel, or accessories
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by other machine or equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vehicle or mobile equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vibration
Stepped on object
Struck against
Struck against moving object or equipment
Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment
Struck against object or equipment
Struck against object or equipment while moving it
Struck against stationary object or equipment
Struck against stationary object or equipment while rising
Struck by
Struck by discharged object or substance
Struck by discharged or flying object
Struck by dislodged flying object, particle
Struck by falling object or equipment
Struck by falling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by falling part of powered vehicle still attached
Struck by object falling from vehicle or machinery - other than vehicle part
Struck by object or equipment
Struck by object or equipment dropped by injured worker
Struck by object or equipment dropped by other person
Struck by object or equipment rolling freely
Struck by or caught in swinging door or gate
Struck by other falling powered vehicle
Struck by powered vehicle - nontransport
Struck by powered vehicle tipping over - nontransport
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle, unspecified
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by another person
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by injured worker
Struck by swinging or slipping object, other than handheld
Struck by swinging part of powered vehicle
Struck by thrown object - unintentional injury
Struck or run over by rolling powered vehicle
Struck, caught, or crushed in collapsing structure, equipment, or material
Struck, caught, or crushed in other collapsing structure or equipment
Exposure to Harmful Substances or Environments
Choking on object or substance
Contact with cold objects or substances
Contact with hot objects or substances
Depletion of oxygen
Direct exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Direct exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Exposure through intact skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure through medical injection
Exposure through scratch or other open wound
Exposure through unintentional needlestick or sharp injury
Exposure to air and water pressure change
Exposure to change in air pressure
Exposure to change in water pressure
Exposure to environmental cold
Exposure to environmental heat
Exposure to harmful substance through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure to light
Exposure to light and other radiation
Exposure to noise
Exposure to other harmful substance - multiple routes of exposure
Exposure to other harmful substances
Exposure to other radiation
Exposure to oxygen deficiency, unspecified
Exposure to radiation and noise
Exposure to temperature extremes
Indirect exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Indirect exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Ingestion of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance - multiple episodes
Inhalation of harmful substance - single episode
Multiple types of exposures through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Nonmedical use of drugs or alcohol - unintentional overdose
Repeated exposure to noise
Single, brief exposure to noise
Single, prolonged exposure to noise
Falls, Slips & Trips
Same level fall
Fall on same level due to slipping
Fall on same level due to tripping
Fall on same level due to tripping on uneven surface
Fall on same level due to tripping over an object
Fall on same level due to tripping over self
Fall on same level while climbing stairs, steps, or curbs
Lower level fall
Fall from collapsing structure or equipment
Fall or jump curtailed by personal fall arrest system
Fall through surface or existing opening
Jump from collapsing structure or equipment
Jumps to lower level
Other fall to lower level
Slip Trip
Slip on substance without fall
Slip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Slip or trip without fall
Trip from stepping into a hole without fall
Trip on uneven surface without fall
Trip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Trip over an object without fall
Trip over self without fall
Trip without fall
Same level fall
Fall while sitting
Fires & Explosions
Collapsing building, structure, or structural element during fire
Demolition or blasting explosion
Dust explosion
Explosion of nonpressurized vapors, gases, or liquids
Explosion of pressure vessel, piping, or tire
Explosions
Fires
Forest or brush fire
Ignition of clothing from controlled heat source
Ignition of vapors, gases, or liquids
Other structural fire without collapse
Small-scale (limited) fire
Vehicle or machinery fire
Overexertion & Bodily Reaction
Body positioning
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - repetitive or prolonged
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - single episode
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - repetitive or prolonged
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - single episode
Climbing or stepping up or down - repetitive or prolonged
Climbing or stepping up or down - single episode
Kneeling, kneeling down - repetitive or prolonged
Kneeling, kneeling down - single episode
Multiple types of exertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of overexertion involving outside sources
Multiple types of overexertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of repetitive motions
Overexertion
Other exertions or bodily reactions
Overexertion in catching - multiple episodes
Overexertion in catching - single episode
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - multiple episodes
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - single episode
Overexertion in lifting - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lifting - single episode
Overexertion in lifting, lowering
Overexertion in lowering - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lowering - single episode
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - multiple episodes
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - single episode
Overexertion in throwing - multiple episodes
Overexertion in throwing - single episode
Overexertion in throwing, catching
Overexertion involving outside sources
Repetitive grasping, placing, or moving objects, except tools
Repetitive motions involving microtasks
Repetitive use of hands, not involving tools
Repetitive use of tools, instruments
Running, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Running, without other incident - single episode
Sitting, sitting down - repetitive or prolonged
Sitting, sitting down - single episode
Standing, standing up - repetitive or prolonged
Standing, standing up - single episode
Sustained viewing
Typing, key entry, texting, or mousing
Walking, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Walking, without other incident - single episode
Transportation Incidents
Aircraft incidents
Bike or scooter incident
Collision between a moving and standing vehicle, nonroadway
Collision between rail vehicle and another vehicle
Derailment of a rail vehicle
Fall on rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from and struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, nonroadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, roadway
Moving in opposite directions, oncoming, nonroadway
Moving in same direction, nonroadway
Nonroadway collision with other vehicle
Nonroadway collisions with object other than vehicle
Nonroadway incidents involving motorized land vehicles
Nonroadway noncollision incident
Part of occupant body caught between vehicle and other object in nonroadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian vehicular incidents
Rail vehicle incidents
Ran off driving surface, nonroadway
Ran off roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle in roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle on side of roadway
Roadway collision - moving in opposite directions, oncoming
Roadway collision - moving in same direction
Roadway collision - moving perpendicularly
Roadway collision with object other than vehicle
Roadway collision with other vehicle
Roadway noncollision incident
Struck bump, hole, or rough terrain in road surface
Struck bump, hole, rough terrain on driving surface, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, roadway
Sudden start or stop, nonroadway
Sudden start or stop, roadway
Vehicle struck by falling or flying object - roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal in roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal on side of roadway
Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animals
Animal and insect related incidents
Bitten and or struck by animal
Drug overdose
Injury by other person - intentional
Injury by other person - unintentional or intent unknown
Nonvenomous stings and bites
Self-inflicted injury - intentional
Self-inflicted injury - unintentional or intent unknown
Venomous Stings and Bites
119. Body Part Injured (#2)
List Multi-level
Head
Head, unspecified
Cranial region, including skull
Brain
Scalp
Skull
Multiple cranial region locations
Ear(s)
Face
Forehead
Eye(s)
Nose, nasal cavity
Nose, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Nasopharynx
Nasal passage(s)
Sinus(es)
Multiple internal nasal locations
Cheek(s)
Jaw, chin
Mouth
Lip(s)
Tongue
Tooth (teeth)
Gum
Multiple mouth locations
Multiple face locations
Multiple head locations
Neck, Including Throat
Neck, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Vocal cord(s)
Larynx
Laryngopharynx
Pharynx
Trachea
Multiple internal neck locations
Trunk
Chest, including ribs, internal organs
Chest, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Esophagus
Heart
Bronchus
Lung(s), pleura
Breast(s)—internal
Multiple internal chest locations
Back, including spine, spinal cord
Thoracic region
Lumbar region
Sacral region
Coccygeal region
Multiple back regions
Back, including spine, spinal cord, n.e.c.
Abdomen
Abdomen, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Stomach organ
Spleen
Urinary organs
Bladder
Kidney(s)
Multiple urinary organs
Intestines, peritoneum
Peritoneum
Small intestine
Large intestine, colon, rectum
Multiple intestinal locations
Other digestive structures
Liver
Gallbladder
Pancreas
Multiple other digestive structures
Multiple internal abdominal locations
Pelvic region
Pelvic region, unspecified
Hip(s)
Pelvis
Buttock(s)
Groin
External reproductive tract structures
Scrotum
Penis
External female genital region
Multiple external reproductive tract structures
Internal reproductive tract structures
Prostate
Testis (testes)
Ovary (ovaries)
Uterus
Multiple internal reproductive tract structures
Multiple pelvic region locations
Multiple trunk locations
Upper Extremities
Shoulder(s), including clavicle(s), scapula(e)
Arm(s)
Upper arm(s)
Elbow(s)
Forearm(s)
Multiple arm locations
Elbow(s) and arms(s)
Wrist(s)
Hand(s)
Hand(s), except finger(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s)
Fingernail(s), nailbed(s)
Fingertip(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.
Hand(s) and finger(s)
Hand(s), n.e.c.
Multiple upper extremities locations
Hand(s) and arms(s)
Hand(s) and elbow(s)
Hand(s) and wrist(s)
Wrist(s) and arm(s)
Wrist(s) and elbow(s)
Shoulder(s) and arm(s)
Lower Extremities
Leg(s)
Thigh(s)
Knee(s)
Lower leg(s)
Multiple leg locations
Knee(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s)
Foot (feet)
Top of Foot (feet)
Sole(s)
Sole(s), unspecified
Ball(s) of the foot
Arch(es), instep(s)
Heel(s)
Multiple sole locations
Toes(s), toenail(s)
Multiple foot (feet) locations
Multiple lower extremities locations
Foot (feet) and leg(s)
Foot(feet) and knee(s)
Foot (feet) and ankle(s)
Ankle(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s) and knee(s)
Body Systems
Multiple Body Parts
Head and neck
Head, neck, and trunk
Head and trunk
Neck and back
Shoulder(s) and back
Hip(s) and leg(s)
Upper and lower limb(s)
Other multiple body parts
Whole body
Other Body Parts
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the head
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the trunk
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the upper extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the lower extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices involving multiple body parts
Nonclassifiable
Respiratory System
120. Injury Type (#2)
List Drop-down
Select...
Abrasion
Amputation
Asphyxia
Avulsion
Broken/chipped/cracked/fractured bones (including teeth)
Burn (Heat or Chemical)
Contusion (Bruise)
Dislocation
Electrical Shock
Fatality
Heat Exhaustion / Stroke
Hernia
Illness
Impalement
Inflammation
Laceration
Loss of Eye
Loss of Consciousness
Puncture/foreign object
Punctured Eardrum
Skin Irritation
Sprain / Strain
Other
121. Main Cause of Injury (#2)
List Multi-level
Contact with Objects & Equipment
Caught in
Caught between rolling powered vehicle and other object
Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects
Caught in running equipment or machinery
Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Compressed or pinched between two stationary objects
Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment
Engulfment in other collapsing material
Entangled in other object or equipment
Excavation or trenching cave-in
Landslide
Mine collapse or cave-in
Other cave-in
Contact
Contact with objects and equipment
Injured by handheld object or equipment
Injured by object breaking in hand
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by injured worker
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by other person
Rubbed or abraded by foreign matter in eye
Rubbed or abraded by friction or pressure
Rubbed or abraded by kneeling on surface
Rubbed or abraded by objects being handled
Rubbed or abraded by shoes, apparel, or accessories
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by other machine or equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vehicle or mobile equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vibration
Stepped on object
Struck against
Struck against moving object or equipment
Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment
Struck against object or equipment
Struck against object or equipment while moving it
Struck against stationary object or equipment
Struck against stationary object or equipment while rising
Struck by
Struck by discharged object or substance
Struck by discharged or flying object
Struck by dislodged flying object, particle
Struck by falling object or equipment
Struck by falling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by falling part of powered vehicle still attached
Struck by object falling from vehicle or machinery - other than vehicle part
Struck by object or equipment
Struck by object or equipment dropped by injured worker
Struck by object or equipment dropped by other person
Struck by object or equipment rolling freely
Struck by or caught in swinging door or gate
Struck by other falling powered vehicle
Struck by powered vehicle - nontransport
Struck by powered vehicle tipping over - nontransport
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle, unspecified
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by another person
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by injured worker
Struck by swinging or slipping object, other than handheld
Struck by swinging part of powered vehicle
Struck by thrown object - unintentional injury
Struck or run over by rolling powered vehicle
Struck, caught, or crushed in collapsing structure, equipment, or material
Struck, caught, or crushed in other collapsing structure or equipment
Exposure to Harmful Substances or Environments
Choking on object or substance
Contact with cold objects or substances
Contact with hot objects or substances
Depletion of oxygen
Direct exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Direct exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Exposure through intact skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure through medical injection
Exposure through scratch or other open wound
Exposure through unintentional needlestick or sharp injury
Exposure to air and water pressure change
Exposure to change in air pressure
Exposure to change in water pressure
Exposure to environmental cold
Exposure to environmental heat
Exposure to harmful substance through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure to light
Exposure to light and other radiation
Exposure to noise
Exposure to other harmful substance - multiple routes of exposure
Exposure to other harmful substances
Exposure to other radiation
Exposure to oxygen deficiency, unspecified
Exposure to radiation and noise
Exposure to temperature extremes
Indirect exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Indirect exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Ingestion of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance - multiple episodes
Inhalation of harmful substance - single episode
Multiple types of exposures through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Nonmedical use of drugs or alcohol - unintentional overdose
Repeated exposure to noise
Single, brief exposure to noise
Single, prolonged exposure to noise
Falls, Slips & Trips
Same level fall
Fall on same level due to slipping
Fall on same level due to tripping
Fall on same level due to tripping on uneven surface
Fall on same level due to tripping over an object
Fall on same level due to tripping over self
Fall on same level while climbing stairs, steps, or curbs
Lower level fall
Fall from collapsing structure or equipment
Fall or jump curtailed by personal fall arrest system
Fall through surface or existing opening
Jump from collapsing structure or equipment
Jumps to lower level
Other fall to lower level
Slip Trip
Slip on substance without fall
Slip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Slip or trip without fall
Trip from stepping into a hole without fall
Trip on uneven surface without fall
Trip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Trip over an object without fall
Trip over self without fall
Trip without fall
Same level fall
Fall while sitting
Fires & Explosions
Collapsing building, structure, or structural element during fire
Demolition or blasting explosion
Dust explosion
Explosion of nonpressurized vapors, gases, or liquids
Explosion of pressure vessel, piping, or tire
Explosions
Fires
Forest or brush fire
Ignition of clothing from controlled heat source
Ignition of vapors, gases, or liquids
Other structural fire without collapse
Small-scale (limited) fire
Vehicle or machinery fire
Overexertion & Bodily Reaction
Body positioning
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - repetitive or prolonged
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - single episode
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - repetitive or prolonged
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - single episode
Climbing or stepping up or down - repetitive or prolonged
Climbing or stepping up or down - single episode
Kneeling, kneeling down - repetitive or prolonged
Kneeling, kneeling down - single episode
Multiple types of exertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of overexertion involving outside sources
Multiple types of overexertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of repetitive motions
Overexertion
Other exertions or bodily reactions
Overexertion in catching - multiple episodes
Overexertion in catching - single episode
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - multiple episodes
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - single episode
Overexertion in lifting - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lifting - single episode
Overexertion in lifting, lowering
Overexertion in lowering - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lowering - single episode
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - multiple episodes
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - single episode
Overexertion in throwing - multiple episodes
Overexertion in throwing - single episode
Overexertion in throwing, catching
Overexertion involving outside sources
Repetitive grasping, placing, or moving objects, except tools
Repetitive motions involving microtasks
Repetitive use of hands, not involving tools
Repetitive use of tools, instruments
Running, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Running, without other incident - single episode
Sitting, sitting down - repetitive or prolonged
Sitting, sitting down - single episode
Standing, standing up - repetitive or prolonged
Standing, standing up - single episode
Sustained viewing
Typing, key entry, texting, or mousing
Walking, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Walking, without other incident - single episode
Transportation Incidents
Aircraft incidents
Bike or scooter incident
Collision between a moving and standing vehicle, nonroadway
Collision between rail vehicle and another vehicle
Derailment of a rail vehicle
Fall on rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from and struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, nonroadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, roadway
Moving in opposite directions, oncoming, nonroadway
Moving in same direction, nonroadway
Nonroadway collision with other vehicle
Nonroadway collisions with object other than vehicle
Nonroadway incidents involving motorized land vehicles
Nonroadway noncollision incident
Part of occupant body caught between vehicle and other object in nonroadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian vehicular incidents
Rail vehicle incidents
Ran off driving surface, nonroadway
Ran off roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle in roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle on side of roadway
Roadway collision - moving in opposite directions, oncoming
Roadway collision - moving in same direction
Roadway collision - moving perpendicularly
Roadway collision with object other than vehicle
Roadway collision with other vehicle
Roadway noncollision incident
Struck bump, hole, or rough terrain in road surface
Struck bump, hole, rough terrain on driving surface, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, roadway
Sudden start or stop, nonroadway
Sudden start or stop, roadway
Vehicle struck by falling or flying object - roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal in roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal on side of roadway
Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animals
Animal and insect related incidents
Bitten and or struck by animal
Drug overdose
Injury by other person - intentional
Injury by other person - unintentional or intent unknown
Nonvenomous stings and bites
Self-inflicted injury - intentional
Self-inflicted injury - unintentional or intent unknown
Venomous Stings and Bites
122. Body Part Injured (#3)
List Multi-level
Head
Head, unspecified
Cranial region, including skull
Brain
Scalp
Skull
Multiple cranial region locations
Ear(s)
Face
Forehead
Eye(s)
Nose, nasal cavity
Nose, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Nasopharynx
Nasal passage(s)
Sinus(es)
Multiple internal nasal locations
Cheek(s)
Jaw, chin
Mouth
Lip(s)
Tongue
Tooth (teeth)
Gum
Multiple mouth locations
Multiple face locations
Multiple head locations
Neck, Including Throat
Neck, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Vocal cord(s)
Larynx
Laryngopharynx
Pharynx
Trachea
Multiple internal neck locations
Trunk
Chest, including ribs, internal organs
Chest, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Esophagus
Heart
Bronchus
Lung(s), pleura
Breast(s)—internal
Multiple internal chest locations
Back, including spine, spinal cord
Thoracic region
Lumbar region
Sacral region
Coccygeal region
Multiple back regions
Back, including spine, spinal cord, n.e.c.
Abdomen
Abdomen, except internal location of diseases or disorders
Stomach organ
Spleen
Urinary organs
Bladder
Kidney(s)
Multiple urinary organs
Intestines, peritoneum
Peritoneum
Small intestine
Large intestine, colon, rectum
Multiple intestinal locations
Other digestive structures
Liver
Gallbladder
Pancreas
Multiple other digestive structures
Multiple internal abdominal locations
Pelvic region
Pelvic region, unspecified
Hip(s)
Pelvis
Buttock(s)
Groin
External reproductive tract structures
Scrotum
Penis
External female genital region
Multiple external reproductive tract structures
Internal reproductive tract structures
Prostate
Testis (testes)
Ovary (ovaries)
Uterus
Multiple internal reproductive tract structures
Multiple pelvic region locations
Multiple trunk locations
Upper Extremities
Shoulder(s), including clavicle(s), scapula(e)
Arm(s)
Upper arm(s)
Elbow(s)
Forearm(s)
Multiple arm locations
Elbow(s) and arms(s)
Wrist(s)
Hand(s)
Hand(s), except finger(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s)
Fingernail(s), nailbed(s)
Fingertip(s)
Finger(s), fingernail(s), n.e.c.
Hand(s) and finger(s)
Hand(s), n.e.c.
Multiple upper extremities locations
Hand(s) and arms(s)
Hand(s) and elbow(s)
Hand(s) and wrist(s)
Wrist(s) and arm(s)
Wrist(s) and elbow(s)
Shoulder(s) and arm(s)
Lower Extremities
Leg(s)
Thigh(s)
Knee(s)
Lower leg(s)
Multiple leg locations
Knee(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s)
Foot (feet)
Top of Foot (feet)
Sole(s)
Sole(s), unspecified
Ball(s) of the foot
Arch(es), instep(s)
Heel(s)
Multiple sole locations
Toes(s), toenail(s)
Multiple foot (feet) locations
Multiple lower extremities locations
Foot (feet) and leg(s)
Foot(feet) and knee(s)
Foot (feet) and ankle(s)
Ankle(s) and leg(s)
Ankle(s) and knee(s)
Body Systems
Multiple Body Parts
Head and neck
Head, neck, and trunk
Head and trunk
Neck and back
Shoulder(s) and back
Hip(s) and leg(s)
Upper and lower limb(s)
Other multiple body parts
Whole body
Other Body Parts
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the head
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the trunk
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the upper extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices of the lower extremities
Prosthetic and orthopedic devices involving multiple body parts
Nonclassifiable
Respiratory System
123. Injury Type (#3)
List Drop-down
Select...
Abrasion
Amputation
Asphyxia
Avulsion
Broken/chipped/cracked/fractured bones (including teeth)
Burn (Heat or Chemical)
Contusion (Bruise)
Dislocation
Electrical Shock
Fatality
Heat Exhaustion / Stroke
Hernia
Illness
Impalement
Inflammation
Laceration
Loss of Eye
Loss of Consciousness
Puncture/foreign object
Punctured Eardrum
Skin Irritation
Sprain / Strain
Other
124. Main Cause of Injury (#3)
List Multi-level
Contact with Objects & Equipment
Caught in
Caught between rolling powered vehicle and other object
Caught in or compressed by equipment or objects
Caught in running equipment or machinery
Caught in running equipment or machinery during maintenance, cleaning
Caught in running equipment or machinery during regular operation
Compressed or pinched between two stationary objects
Compressed or pinched by shifting objects or equipment
Engulfment in other collapsing material
Entangled in other object or equipment
Excavation or trenching cave-in
Landslide
Mine collapse or cave-in
Other cave-in
Contact
Contact with objects and equipment
Injured by handheld object or equipment
Injured by object breaking in hand
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by injured worker
Injured by slipping or swinging object held by other person
Rubbed or abraded by foreign matter in eye
Rubbed or abraded by friction or pressure
Rubbed or abraded by kneeling on surface
Rubbed or abraded by objects being handled
Rubbed or abraded by shoes, apparel, or accessories
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by other machine or equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vehicle or mobile equipment vibration
Rubbed, abraded, or jarred by vibration
Stepped on object
Struck against
Struck against moving object or equipment
Struck against moving part of machinery or equipment
Struck against object or equipment
Struck against object or equipment while moving it
Struck against stationary object or equipment
Struck against stationary object or equipment while rising
Struck by
Struck by discharged object or substance
Struck by discharged or flying object
Struck by dislodged flying object, particle
Struck by falling object or equipment
Struck by falling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by falling part of powered vehicle still attached
Struck by object falling from vehicle or machinery - other than vehicle part
Struck by object or equipment
Struck by object or equipment dropped by injured worker
Struck by object or equipment dropped by other person
Struck by object or equipment rolling freely
Struck by or caught in swinging door or gate
Struck by other falling powered vehicle
Struck by powered vehicle - nontransport
Struck by powered vehicle tipping over - nontransport
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle
Struck by rolling object or equipment - other than powered vehicle, unspecified
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by another person
Struck by rolling object or equipment being pushed by injured worker
Struck by swinging or slipping object, other than handheld
Struck by swinging part of powered vehicle
Struck by thrown object - unintentional injury
Struck or run over by rolling powered vehicle
Struck, caught, or crushed in collapsing structure, equipment, or material
Struck, caught, or crushed in other collapsing structure or equipment
Exposure to Harmful Substances or Environments
Choking on object or substance
Contact with cold objects or substances
Contact with hot objects or substances
Depletion of oxygen
Direct exposure to electricity
Direct exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Direct exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Exposure through intact skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure through medical injection
Exposure through scratch or other open wound
Exposure through unintentional needlestick or sharp injury
Exposure to air and water pressure change
Exposure to change in air pressure
Exposure to change in water pressure
Exposure to electricity
Exposure to environmental cold
Exposure to environmental heat
Exposure to harmful substance through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Exposure to light
Exposure to light and other radiation
Exposure to noise
Exposure to other harmful substance - multiple routes of exposure
Exposure to other harmful substances
Exposure to other radiation
Exposure to oxygen deficiency, unspecified
Exposure to radiation and noise
Exposure to temperature extremes
Indirect exposure to electricity
Indirect exposure to electricity, 220 volts or less
Indirect exposure to electricity, greater than 220 volts
Ingestion of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance
Inhalation of harmful substance - multiple episodes
Inhalation of harmful substance - single episode
Multiple types of exposures through skin, eyes, or other exposed tissue
Nonmedical use of drugs or alcohol - unintentional overdose
Repeated exposure to noise
Single, brief exposure to noise
Single, prolonged exposure to noise
Falls, Slips & Trips
Same level fall
Fall on same level due to slipping
Fall on same level due to tripping
Fall on same level due to tripping on uneven surface
Fall on same level due to tripping over an object
Fall on same level due to tripping over self
Fall on same level while climbing stairs, steps, or curbs
Lower level fall
Fall from collapsing structure or equipment
Fall or jump curtailed by personal fall arrest system
Fall through surface or existing opening
Jump from collapsing structure or equipment
Jumps to lower level
Other fall to lower level
Slip Trip
Slip on substance without fall
Slip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Slip or trip without fall
Trip from stepping into a hole without fall
Trip on uneven surface without fall
Trip on vehicle without fall - nontransport
Trip over an object without fall
Trip over self without fall
Trip without fall
Same level fall
Fall while sitting
Fires & Explosions
Collapsing building, structure, or structural element during fire
Demolition or blasting explosion
Dust explosion
Explosion of nonpressurized vapors, gases, or liquids
Explosion of pressure vessel, piping, or tire
Explosions
Fires
Forest or brush fire
Ignition of clothing from controlled heat source
Ignition of vapors, gases, or liquids
Other structural fire without collapse
Small-scale (limited) fire
Vehicle or machinery fire
Overexertion & Bodily Reaction
Body positioning
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - repetitive or prolonged
Bending, crawling, reaching, twisting - single episode
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - repetitive or prolonged
Boarding, alighting - excluding slip, trip, fall - single episode
Climbing or stepping up or down - repetitive or prolonged
Climbing or stepping up or down - single episode
Kneeling, kneeling down - repetitive or prolonged
Kneeling, kneeling down - single episode
Multiple types of exertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of overexertion involving outside sources
Multiple types of overexertions and bodily reactions
Multiple types of repetitive motions
Overexertion
Other exertions or bodily reactions
Overexertion in catching - multiple episodes
Overexertion in catching - single episode
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - multiple episodes
Overexertion in holding, carrying, or wielding - single episode
Overexertion in lifting - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lifting - single episode
Overexertion in lifting, lowering
Overexertion in lowering - multiple episodes
Overexertion in lowering - single episode
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - multiple episodes
Overexertion in pushing, pulling, or turning - single episode
Overexertion in throwing - multiple episodes
Overexertion in throwing - single episode
Overexertion in throwing, catching
Overexertion involving outside sources
Repetitive grasping, placing, or moving objects, except tools
Repetitive motions involving microtasks
Repetitive use of hands, not involving tools
Repetitive use of tools, instruments
Running, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Running, without other incident - single episode
Sitting, sitting down - repetitive or prolonged
Sitting, sitting down - single episode
Standing, standing up - repetitive or prolonged
Standing, standing up - single episode
Sustained viewing
Typing, key entry, texting, or mousing
Walking, without other incident - repetitive or prolonged
Walking, without other incident - single episode
Transportation Incidents
Aircraft incidents
Bike or scooter incident
Collision between a moving and standing vehicle, nonroadway
Collision between rail vehicle and another vehicle
Derailment of a rail vehicle
Fall on rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by another vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from and struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from and struck by same vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Fall or jump from rail vehicle - transportation incident
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, nonroadway
Fall or jump from vehicle in normal operation, roadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, nonroadway
Jack-knifed or overturned, roadway
Moving in opposite directions, oncoming, nonroadway
Moving in same direction, nonroadway
Nonroadway collision with other vehicle
Nonroadway collisions with object other than vehicle
Nonroadway incidents involving motorized land vehicles
Nonroadway noncollision incident
Part of occupant body caught between vehicle and other object in nonroadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by forward-moving vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by rail vehicle - transportation incident
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle backing up on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in roadway
Pedestrian struck by vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in nonroadway area
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle in work zone
Pedestrian struck by vehicle propelled by another vehicle on side of road
Pedestrian vehicular incidents
Rail vehicle incidents
Ran off driving surface, nonroadway
Ran off roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle in roadway
Roadway collision - moving and standing vehicle on side of roadway
Roadway collision - moving in opposite directions, oncoming
Roadway collision - moving in same direction
Roadway collision - moving perpendicularly
Roadway collision with object other than vehicle
Roadway collision with other vehicle
Roadway noncollision incident
Struck bump, hole, or rough terrain in road surface
Struck bump, hole, rough terrain on driving surface, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, nonroadway
Struck by shifting load during transport, roadway
Sudden start or stop, nonroadway
Sudden start or stop, roadway
Vehicle struck by falling or flying object - roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal in roadway
Vehicle struck object or animal on side of roadway
Violence & Other Injuries by Persons or Animals
Animal and insect related incidents
Bitten and or struck by animal
Drug overdose
Injury by other person - intentional
Injury by other person - unintentional or intent unknown
Nonvenomous stings and bites
Self-inflicted injury - intentional
Self-inflicted injury - unintentional or intent unknown
Venomous Stings and Bites
125. Treatment Classification
List Radio
Jobsite Treatment
Offsite Medical Treatment
Treatment Decilined by Injured Party
126. Medical Treatment Provider
List Radio
REMEMBER TO CALL OCCUCARE FIRST FOR NON EMERGENCY INJURIES INVOLVING SUNDT PERSONNEL 866-268-0884
Occupational Health Clinic
Hospital / Emergency Room / EMS (911)
After Hours / Urgent Care
127. First Aid Provider
List Radio
Occucare
Jobsite First Aid Provider (i.e. Project Site Nurse, etc.)
Project personnel
Self administered
128. Treatment Outcome
List Radio
STCKY Injury - Select SIF criteria from the box below.
First Aid
Restricted Duty
Days Away from work / Lost Time
Other Recordable Criteria - Other Recordable Criteria = prescriptions, therapy, etc., Anything other than Restricted Duty or Lost Time
STCKY Injury - STCKY Injury - Life Threatening (LT) - Worker would not survive without medical intervention
129. STCKY Injury - SIF Criteria
List Radio
Fatality
Amputations (involving bone) excludes distal phalanx
Head trauma that results in a traumatic brain injury (TBI)
Injury or trauma to vital organs
Bone fractures requiring surgery for repair, excluding fingers and toes
Acute traumatic herniated disc with neurologic deficit
3rd degree burn requiring skin graft
Eye injuries resulting in permanent vision loss or change in vision
High pressure injection injuries requiring surgical debridement and irrigation
Heat Stroke – Medically diagnosed
Electrical Contact Injury – Resulting in life-threatening cardiac, neurological, or burn injuries requiring emergency or hospital-level care
Vascular trauma requiring surgery
Acute chemical or radiological exposure resulting in injury to vital organs
Other Injuries
130. Injury Classification: First Aid
Text Label
131. Injury Classification: Recordable
Text Label
132. Clinic Hospital Name
Text Short
133. Clinic Hospital Address
Text Short
134. Clinic Hospital Phone Number
Text Short
135. First day of lost time
Date
136. Has lost time ended?
List Drop-down
Select...
Yes, returned to regular duty
Yes, returned to modified duty
Yes, employee was terminated
No, employee is currently on lost time
137. First day of modified duty
Date
138. Date returned to modified duty
Date
139. Date returned to regular work
Date
140. Employment Termination Date
Date
141. Miscellaneous Injury Notes / Other Recordable Criteria:
Text Short
142. Employee Number
Text Short
Input a single 0 if unknown
143. Date of Birth
Date
input today's date if unknown
144. Date of Hire
Date
input today's date if unknown
145. Current, Physical Address (Street name & number, city, state, zip)
Text Short
input a 0 if unknown
146. Hourly Wage
Number
147. Side of Body Injured
List Radio
Right
Left
Both
148. Gender
List Radio
Male
Female
149. Name of physician or healthcare professional
Text Short
150. Was employee hospitalized overnight as an in-patient?
List Radio
Yes
No
151. What was the employee doing just before the incident occurred?
Text Short
152. If the employee died, when did death occur?
Date time
6. Equipment, Vehicle, Property #1
click to collapse/expand
Use the "Crane" section for any crane-related equipment documentation. Use the "Utility Damage" section for utility property damage.
153. Owner
List Radio
Who is the owner/responsible person for the equipment/vehicle/property?
Client
Sundt
Trade Contractor
Third Party
Other
154. Equipment Category
List Drop-down
Select...
Non-equipment property
Passenger Vehicles
Pickups
Water Trucks
Trailers
Crawler Tractors and Dozers
Wheel Tractors
Motor Graders
Soil Augers and Drills
Excavators
Compactors and Rollers
Scrapers
Dozer and Motor Grader Attachments
Towable Plows, Discs, and Grading Tools
Lighting Towers and Systems
Buckets and Other Digging Attachments
Bulk Storage Tanks (Dry Materials)
Other Towable Equipment
Off-Highway Haul Trucks
Air Compressors
Welders
Generators
Water Pumps
Mobile Buildings, Storage Containers
Asphalt Spreaders
Asphalt Paving
Asphalt Batching & Mixing
Sweepers
Conveyors
Crushing & Screening Plants
Concrete Finishing Machines
Winches and Hoisting Equipment
Contrete Batching Equipment
Concrete Paving
Power Units
Front End Loaders
Generators Highcycle
Saws
Boilers & Steam Heaters
Scales
Aerial Lifts
Survey and Machine Controls
Compactors & Tampers
Pile Hammers & Extractors
Forklifts, Telehandlers, and Lift Trucks
Drills & Rock Bolters
Steam Cleaners & Pressure Washers
Trenchers
Utility Vehicles
Boats & Barges
Equipment Service Bodies and Trucks
Railroad Equipment
Concrete Placing Equipment and Tools
Tunnel Boring
Forming Systems
Other Small Tools
Commercial Motor Vehicles
Water Storage Tanks and Towers
Aerial Drones and Imaging
Transit and Truck Mounted Mixer Trucks
Water / Hydro Vac Truck
Semi Trucks
155. Equipment or Property Description/Make/Model/License Plate/etc
Text Short
156. Equipment Display
Integrated list
157. Equipment Description
Integrated list
158. Third Party's Insurance Info
Text Short
Company, policy number, ID, insured, etc.
159. Third Party's Driver License #
Text Short
160. Description of Damage/Loss
Text Short
161. Work Order Cost Type
Text Short
162. Issued Work Order Number
Text Short
163. Value of Damage/Loss
List Radio
Under $1k
Over $1k
N/A or none
164. Was business interrupted?
List Radio
For example: A fiber optic/gas/electrical utility was damaged by construction activities which caused outage for nearby businesses.
Yes business interrupted
No business interruption
165. Estimated Value of Damage/Loss
Number
166. Incident occurred during
List Radio
Mobile equipment repair / maintenance
n/a
7. Equipment, Vehicle, Property #2
click to collapse/expand
Use the "Crane" section for any crane-related equipment documentation. Use the "Utility Damage" section for utility property damage.
167. Owner
List Radio
Who is the owner/responsible person for the equipment/vehicle/property?
Client
Sundt
Trade Contractor
Third Party
Other
168. Equipment Category
List Drop-down
Select...
Non-equipment property
Passenger Vehicles
Pickups
Water Trucks
Trailers
Crawler Tractors and Dozers
Wheel Tractors
Motor Graders
Soil Augers and Drills
Excavators
Compactors and Rollers
Scrapers
Dozer and Motor Grader Attachments
Towable Plows, Discs, and Grading Tools
Lighting Towers and Systems
Buckets and Other Digging Attachments
Bulk Storage Tanks (Dry Materials)
Other Towable Equipment
Off-Highway Haul Trucks
Air Compressors
Welders
Generators
Water Pumps
Mobile Buildings, Storage Containers
Asphalt Spreaders
Asphalt Paving
Asphalt Batching and Mixing
Sweepers
Conveyors
Crushing & Screening Plants
Concrete Finishing Machines
Winches and Hoisting Equipment
Concrete Batching Equipment
Concrete Paving
Power Units
Front End Loaders
Generators Highcycle
Saws
Boilers & Steam Heaters
Scales
Aerial Lifts
Survey and Machine Controls
Compactors & Tampers
Pile Hammers & Extractors
Forklifts, Telehandlers, and Lift Trucks
Drills & Rock Bolters
Steam Cleaners & Pressure Washers
Trenchers
Utility Vehicles
Boats & Barges
Equipment Service Bodies and Trucks
Railroad Equipment
Concrete Placing Equipment and Tools
Tunnel Boring
Forming Systems
Other Small Tools
Commercial Motor Vehicles
Water Storage Tanks and Towers
Aerial Drones and Imaging
Transit and Truck Mounted Mixer Trucks
Water / Hydro Vac Truck
Semi Trucks
169. Equipment or Property Description/Make/Model/License Plate/etc
Text Short
170. Equipment Display
Integrated list
171. Equipment Description
Integrated list
172. Third Party's Insurance Info
Text Short
Company, policy number, ID, insured, etc.
173. Third Party's Driver License #
Text Short
174. Description of Damage/Loss
Text Short
175. Work Order Cost Type
Text Short
176. Issued Work Order Number
Text Short
177. Value of Damage/Loss
List Radio
Under $1k
Over $1k
N/A or none
178. Was business interrupted?
List Radio
For example: A fiber optic/gas/electrical utility was damaged by construction activities which caused outage for nearby businesses.
Yes business interrupted
No business interruption
179. Estimated Value of Damage/Loss
Number
180. Incident occurred during
List Radio
Mobile equipment repair / maintenance
n/a
8. Equipment, Vehicle, Property #3
click to collapse/expand
Use the "Crane" section for any crane-related equipment documentation. Use the "Utility Damage" section for utility property damage.
181. Owner
List Radio
Who is the owner/responsible person for the equipment/vehicle/property?
Client
Sundt
Trade Contractor
Third Party
Other
182. Equipment Category
List Drop-down
Select...
Non-equipment property
Passenger Vehicles
Pickups
Water Trucks
Trailers
Crawler Tractors and Dozers
Wheel Tractors
Motor Graders
Soil Augers and Drills
Excavators
Compactors and Rollers
Scrapers
Dozer and Motor Grader Attachments
Towable Plows, Discs, and Grading Tools
Lighting Towers and Systems
Buckets and Other Digging Attachments
Bulk Storage Tanks (Dry Materials)
Other Towable Equipment
Off-Highway Haul Trucks
Air Compressors
Welders
Generators
Water Pumps
Mobile Buildings, Storage Containers
Asphalt Spreaders
Asphalt Paving
Asphalt Batching and Mixing
Sweepers
Conveyors
Crushing & Screening Plants
Concrete Finishing Machines
Winches and Hoisting Equipment
Concrete Batching Equipment
Concrete Paving
Power Units
Front End Loaders
Generators Highcycle
Saws
Boilers and Steam Heaters
Scales
Aerial Lifts
Survey and Machine Controls
Compactors & Tampers
Pile Hammers & Extractors
Forklifts, Telehandlers, and Lift Trucks
Drills & Rock Bolters
Steam Cleaners & Pressure Washers
Trenchers
Utility Vehicles
Boats & Barges
Equipment Service Bodies and Trucks
Railroad Equipment
Concrete Placing Equipment and Tools
Tunnel Boring
Forming Systems
Other Small Tools
Commercial Motor Vehicles
Water Storage Tanks and Towers
Aerial Drones and Imaging
Transit and Truck Mounted Mixer Trucks
Water / Hydro Vac Truck
Semi Trucks
183. Equipment or Property Description/Make/Model/License Plate/etc
Text Short
184. Equipment Display
Integrated list
185. Equipment Description
Integrated list
186. Third Party's Insurance Info
Text Short
Company, policy number, ID, insured, etc.
187. Third Party's Driver License #
Text Short
188. Description of Damage/Loss
Text Short
189. Work Order Cost Type
Text Short
190. Issued Work Order Number
Text Short
191. Value of Damage/Loss
List Radio
Under $1k
Over $1k
N/A or none
192. Was business interrupted?
List Radio
For example: A fiber optic/gas/electrical utility was damaged by construction activities which caused outage for nearby businesses.
Yes business interrupted
No business interruption
193. Estimated Value of Damage/Loss
Number
194. Incident occurred during
List Radio
Mobile equipment repair / maintenance
n/a
9. Crane #1 Information
click to collapse/expand
195. Crane Owner
List Radio
Sundt
Trade Contractor
Third Party / Rental / Crane Service Company
196. Sundt Crane ID
List Drop-down
Select...
CT0069 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 60TN
CT0071 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 65TN
CT0072 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 80TN
CT0073 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 90TN
CT0074 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 100TN
CT0075 - CRANE CRAWLER 250TN
CT0076 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 100TN
CT0077 - CRANE OSS SHOP 5 TON
CT0078 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 130TN
CT0079 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 160TN
CT0080 - CRANE HYD CRAWLER 250TN
197. Identity of Crane Owner/Responsible Party:
Text Short
198. Crane Type
List Drop-down
Select...
All Terrain
Carry Deck
Crawler
Hammerhead
Level Luffing
Luffing Jib (static)
Rough Terrain
Self Erecting
Tower
Vehicle Mounted
199. Crane Make & Model
Text Short
200. Did the crane incur damage as a result of this incident?
List Radio
Yes, crane incurred damage
No damage
201. Value of Crane Damage/Loss
List Radio
Under $1k
Over $1k
202. Estimated Value of Crane Damage/Loss
Number
203. Did incident occur during repair or maintenance?
List Radio
Yes
No
204. Did incident occur during assembly/disassembly?
List Radio
Yes
No
205. Was an A/D Director present at the time of incident?
Choice
Yes
No
206. A/D Director - Type First and Last Name
Text Short
207. Has a Qualified Crane Manager been identified for the project?
Choice
Yes
No
208. Qualified Crane Manager - Type First and Last Name
Text Short
209. Was the Lift Director on site?
Choice
Yes
No
210. Lift Director - first and last name
Text Short
211. Was the operator authorized by Sundt?
Choice
Yes
No
212. Any crane plans need revision?
List Checkbox
n/a
Assembly/Disassembly Plan
Lift Plan
Move Plan
10. Crane #2 Information
click to collapse/expand
213. Crane Owner
List Radio
Sundt
Trade Contractor
Third Party / Rental / Crane Service Company
214. Sundt Crane ID
List Drop-down
Select...
CT0069 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 60TN
CT0071 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 65TN
CT0072 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 80TN
CT0073 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 90TN
CT0074 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 100TN
CT0075 - CRANE CRAWLER 250TN
CT0076 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 100TN
CT0077 - CRANE OSS SHOP 5 TON
CT0078 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 130TN
CT0079 - CRANE HYDRAULIC 160TN
CT0080 - CRANE HYD CRAWLER 250TN
215. Identity of Crane Owner/Responsible Party:
Text Short
216. Crane Type
List Drop-down
Select...
All Terrain
Carry Deck
Crawler
Hammerhead
Level Luffing
Luffing Jib (static)
Rough Terrain
Self Erecting
Tower
Vehicle Mounted
217. Crane Make & Model
Text Short
218. Did the crane incur damage as a result of this incident?
List Radio
Yes, crane incurred damage
No damage
219. Value of Crane Damage/Loss
List Radio
Under $1k
Over $1k
220. Estimated Value of Crane Damage/Loss
Number
221. Did incident occur during repair or maintenance?
List Radio
Yes
No
222. Did incident occur during assembly/disassembly?
List Radio
Yes
No
223. Was an A/D Director present at the time of incident?
Choice
Yes
No
224. A/D Director - Type First and Last Name
Text Short
225. Has a Qualified Crane Manager been identified for the project?
Choice
Yes
No
226. Qualified Crane Manager - Type First and Last Name
Text Short
227. Was the Lift Director on site?
Choice
Yes
No
228. Lift Director - first and last name
Text Short
229. Was the operator authorized by Sundt?
Choice
Yes
No
230. Any crane plans need revision?
List Checkbox
n/a
Assembly/Disassembly Plan
Lift Plan
Move Plan
11. Utility #1 Damage
click to collapse/expand
231. Utility Location
List Radio
Underground
Above ground
Overhead
232. Utility Installation
List Radio
Existing
Job Installed
233. Utility Type
List Radio
Communication, cable, tv, alarm, signal
Electric, Power, Lighting
Gas, oil, steam petroleum, or gaseous materials
Hydronic
Potable water
Reclaimed water, irrigation
Sewer
Other
Fire Sprinkler
234. If other, write in utility type:
Text Short
235. Right of Way Owner
Text Short
236. Utility Owner Name
Text Short
237. Was a Disturbance Permit in place for this activity?
List Radio
Yes
No
Not applicable
238. Was the utility de-energized?
List Radio
Yes
No
N/A or TBD
239. Was a spotter used?
List Radio
Yes
No
N/A or TBD
240. Was the utility accurately located/marked?
List Radio
Yes
No
Not applicable
241. Why wasn't the utility accurately located/marked?
Text Short
242. Dig Alert / Call 811 / Locate Ticket
Attachment
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
243. Disturbance Permit
Attachment
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
244. Value of Damage/Loss
List Radio
Under $1k
Over $1k
245. Was business interrupted?
List Radio
Yes business interrupted
No business interruption
246. Estimated Value of Damage/Loss
Number
12. Utility #2 Damage
click to collapse/expand
247. Utility Location
List Radio
Underground
Above ground
Overhead
248. Utility Installation
List Radio
Existing
Job Installed
249. Utility Type
List Radio
Communication, cable, tv, alarm, signal
Electric, Power, Lighting
Gas, oil, steam petroleum, or gaseous materials
Hydronic
Potable water
Reclaimed water, irrigation
Sewer
Other
Fire Sprinkler
250. If other, write in utility type:
Text Short
251. Right of Way Owner
Text Short
252. Utility Owner Name
Text Short
253. Was a Disturbance Permit in place for this activity?
List Radio
Yes
No
Not applicable
254. Was the utility de-energized?
List Radio
Yes
No
N/A or TBD
255. Was a spotter used?
List Radio
Yes
No
N/A or TBD
256. Was the utility accurately located/marked?
List Radio
Yes
No
Not applicable
257. Why wasn't the utility accurately located/marked?
Text Short
258. Dig Alert / Call 811 / Locate Ticket
Attachment
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
259. Disturbance Permit
Attachment
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
260. Value of Damage/Loss
List Radio
Under $1k
Over $1k
261. Was business interrupted?
List Radio
Yes business interrupted
No business interruption
262. Estimated Value of Damage/Loss
Number
13. Water Intrusion
click to collapse/expand
263. Select the classification
List Radio
Minor - We can clean up the water and remove ALL wet materials off the site
Serious - We are not sure how far the water traveled and we are going to have to call for remediation. ---> Immediately call Maree Urias Buono (520) 709-6964 - Immediately call Maree Urias Buono (520) 709-6964
264. What to do in the event of water intrusion
Reference document
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
265. Status of structures/materials subjected to intrusion
List Radio
Less than 24 hrs, up to 48 hrs
More than 48 hrs with no visible growth
Visible growth
266. Surface area affected
List Radio
Level 1: Less than 10 square feet
Level 2: 10-30 square feet
Level 4: More than 100 square feet
Level 5A & 5B Remediation HVAC
267. Building occupancy status
List Radio
Occupied building
Non-occupied building
268. What caused the intrusion?
List Radio
Weather related
Utility related
269. Remediation Contractor
Text Short
270. Industrial Hygienist
Text Short
271. Lab
Text Short
272. Investigate and evaluate moisture and mold problems
List Checkbox
Assess size of moldy area (square feet)
Consider the possibility of hidden mold
Clean up small mold problems and fix moisture problems before they become large problems
Select a remediation manager for medium or large size mold problem
Investigate areas associated with occupant complaints
Identify source(s) or cause(s) of water or moisture problem(s)
Note type of water-damaged materials (wallboard, carpet, etc.)
Check inside air ducts and air handling unit(s)
Throughout process, consult a qualified professional if necessary or desired
Immediately report the event to Sundt’s HS&E Department to determine if insurance coverage exists through Sundt, Owner, or subcontractor’s insurance programs.
273. Communicate with building occupants at all stages of process, as appropriate
List Checkbox
Designate contact person for questions and comments about medium or large-scale remediation as needed
Arrange for comparable temporary facilities for occupants during remediation
274. Plan remediation
List Checkbox
Adapt/modify remediation guidelines for the situation; use professional judgment
Plan to dry wet, non-moldy materials within 48 hours to prevent mold growth
Select cleanup methods for moldy items
Select Personal Protection Equipment - protect remediators
Select containment equipment - protect building occupants
Select remediation personnel who have the experience and training needed to implement the Remediation plan and use Personal Protection Equipment and containment as appropriate
275. Remediate moisture and mold problems
List Checkbox
Fix moisture problem, implement repair plan and/or maintenance plan
Dry wet, non-moldy materials within 48 hours to prevent mold growth
Clean and dry moldy materials
Discard moldy porous items that can't be cleaned
276. Other remedial actions taken
Text Short
14. STCKY Causal Analysis: S#!t That's Built at Heights
click to collapse/expand
277. Safe access provided to elevated work area?
List Radio
Walking Surfaces | Stairs | Ramps: Relentless Housekeeping - Access | Egress free from obstructions, tripping hazards Landings of not less than 30 inches Uniform riser height and tread depth No hazardous projections: protruding nails Proper Handrail Installed For more information see: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1052 (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1052) Ladders – Ladders - Relentless Housekeeping - Access | Egress free from obstructions, tripping hazards In good condition At least a Type 1A (rated for up to 300 pounds) Constructed of nonconductive material Setup at a 4:1 angle Secured | tied off to prevent movement Extend 3ft beyond landing area or have “pass through” gate Protected from fall exposure by means of a controlled access point Be used per the manufacturer’s instructions For more information see: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053 (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053) Elevated work platform Inspected and maintained Designed for intended use Fall protection system in place
Yes
No
Not applicable
278. Safe access - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Walking Surfaces - Relentless Housekeeping - Access | Egress free from obstructions, tripping hazards
Install Proper Handrail
Ladders - Relentless Housekeeping - Access | Egress free from obstructions, tripping hazards
Replace ladder with at least a Type 1A (rated for up to 300 pounds)
Replace with ladder Constructed of nonconductive material
Install ladder at a 4:1 angle
Secure | tie off ladder to prevent movement
Extend ladder 3ft beyond landing area or install “pass through” gate
Protect workers from fall exposure by means of a controlled access point
MEWP - Review and train per the manufacturer’s instructions
MEWP - Inspect and maintain elevated work platform
MEWP - Use per intended design
MEWP - Install fall protection system
279. Reason for lack of Safe Access
List Radio
Safe access hazard(s) not recognized - Hazard(s) Not Recognized Hazard(s) not recognized by employees involved in the task. Example: Dropped object hazard(s) not recognized by the crew.
Safe access control(s) not identified - Control(s) Not Identified Control(s) not identified for the recognized hazard(s) Example: The crew did not identify the need for tethers, C.A.Z. (Controlled Access Zone), etc., to protect from recognized dropped object hazards.
Safe access control(s) not implemented - Control(s) Not Implemented Identified control(s) were not implemented. Example: C.A.Z. identified as a control for dropped object hazard(s), but not established (implemented).
Safe access control(s) not executed - Control(s) Not Executed Implemented control(s) were not properly executed. Example: C.A.Z. was established but not enforced (executed).
280. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
281. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
282. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
283. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
284. Fall prevention measures adequate?
List Radio
Yes
No
Not applicable
285. Fall Prevention - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Install Top rails at 42”
Install Mid-rails at 21”
Tension Wire rope < 3” deflection
Install guard rail system capable of withstanding 200lbs. of force
Install rated hole covering or standard guardrail system to protect openings larger than 2"
Ensure hole coverings are secured to prevent displacement
Replace hole covering with one capable of supporting 2X max. intended load
Mark, using High Visible paint, “HOLE” or “COVER”
Cal/OSHA - requires hole covers to bear a pressure sensitized, painted, or stenciled sign with legible letters not less than one inch high, stating: “Opening--Do Not Remove.”
Install guardrail system for holes |openings > greater than 24” wide.
Ensure vertical supports max. 8’ apart with top rail, midrail, and toe boards.
Verify Employees trained on fall protection procedures
Installed C.A.Z. min. 6’ back from edge of deck | floor | wall opening.
Ensure 100% Fall protection required when employees cross flagging
286. Reason for lack of Fall Prevention
List Radio
Fall Prevention hazard(s) not recognized - Hazard(s) Not Recognized Hazard(s) not recognized by employees involved in the task. Example: Dropped object hazard(s) not recognized by the crew.
Fall Prevention control(s) not identified - Control(s) Not Identified Control(s) not identified for the recognized hazard(s) Example: The crew did not identify the need for tethers, C.A.Z. (Controlled Access Zone), etc., to protect from recognized dropped object hazards.
Fall Prevention control(s) not implemented - Control(s) Not Implemented Identified control(s) were not implemented. Example: C.A.Z. identified as a control for dropped object hazard(s), but not established (implemented).
Fall Prevention control(s) not executed - Control(s) Not Executed Implemented control(s) were not properly executed. Example: C.A.Z. was established but not enforced (executed).
287. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
288. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
289. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
290. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
291. Personal fall protection properly used?
List Radio
Yes
No
Not applicable
292. Personal Fall Protection - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Select/Install anchor point rated for 5000 lbs or greater
Select leading edge rated lanyard
Ensure fall harness properly donned and inspected
Ensure 100% Tie off
Ensure adequate fall clearance from lower level | obstructions
Review rescue plan / ensure rescue equipment in place
293. Reason for lack of Personal Fall Protection
List Radio
Personal Fall Protection hazard(s) not recognized - Hazard(s) Not Recognized Hazard(s) not recognized by employees involved in the task. Example: Dropped object hazard(s) not recognized by the crew.
Personal Fall Protection control(s) not identified - Control(s) Not Identified Control(s) not identified for the recognized hazard(s) Example: The crew did not identify the need for tethers, C.A.Z. (Controlled Access Zone), etc., to protect from recognized dropped object hazards.
Personal Fall Protection control(s) not implemented - Control(s) Not Implemented Identified control(s) were not implemented. Example: C.A.Z. identified as a control for dropped object hazard(s), but not established (implemented).
Personal Fall Protection control(s) not executed - Control(s) Not Executed Implemented control(s) were not properly executed. Example: C.A.Z. was established but not enforced (executed).
294. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
295. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
296. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
297. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
298. Dropped object protection in place?
List Radio
Yes
No
Not applicable
299. Dropped object protection - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Tether tools and materials while working near leading edge
Remove unneeded tools from elevated work area
Establish C.A.Z. with physical barriers with adequate signage
Remove workers from hazard area, set up adequate C.A.Z.
Designate spotter for C.A.Z. when signage is not being used
Secure/Net material hoisted over active work areas
Repair | Install netting | screening
Install overhead protection at entrances/exits
Remove | secure | distance materials within 6ft. of leading edge
300. Reason for lack of Dropped Object Protection
List Radio
Dropped Object hazard(s) not recognized - Hazard(s) Not Recognized Hazard(s) not recognized by employees involved in the task. Example: Dropped object hazard(s) not recognized by the crew.
Dropped Object control(s) not identified - Control(s) Not Identified Control(s) not identified for the recognized hazard(s) Example: The crew did not identify the need for tethers, C.A.Z. (Controlled Access Zone), etc., to protect from recognized dropped object hazards.
Dropped Object control(s) not implemented - Control(s) Not Implemented Identified control(s) were not implemented. Example: C.A.Z. identified as a control for dropped object hazard(s), but not established (implemented).
Dropped Object control(s) not executed - Control(s) Not Executed Implemented control(s) were not properly executed. Example: C.A.Z. was established but not enforced (executed).
301. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
302. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
303. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
304. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
15. STCKY Causal Analysis: S#!t That Stores Energy
click to collapse/expand
305. Personnel protected from the release of stored energy (Material and Tools)?
List Radio
Stored energy identified Line of fire protection in place (PPE, barricading, spacing) Proper safeguards established for release of energy “Zero energy” tested prior to continuing work
Yes
No
Not applicable
306. Stored Energy (Material and Tools) - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Identify stored energy
Implement line of fire protection in place (PPE, barricading, spacing)
Establish safeguards for release of stored energy
Ensure “Zero energy”, test prior to continuing work
307. Reason for lack of Stored Energy (Material and Tools) controls
List Radio
Stored Energy (Material/Tools) hazard(s) not recognized
Stored Energy (Material/Tools) control(s) not identified
Stored Energy (Material/Tools) control(s) not implemented
Stored Energy (Material/Tools) control(s) not executed
308. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
309. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
310. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
311. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
312. Personnel protected from the release of stored energy? (Mechanical Equipment - Non-electrical)
List Radio
Stored energy identified Inspected and maintained Line of fire protection in place (PPE, barricading, spacing) Proper safeguards established for release of energy “Zero energy” tested prior to continuing work
Yes
No
Not applicable
313. Stored Energy (Mechanical Equipment - Non-electrical) - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Identify stored energy
Inspect and maintain sources of stored energy
Implement line of fire protection in place (PPE, barricading, spacing)
Establish safeguards for release of stored energy
Ensure “Zero energy”, test prior to continuing work
314. Reason for lack of Stored Energy controls (Mechanical Equipment - Non-electrical)
List Radio
Stored Energy (Mech. Equip., Non-Electrical) hazard(s) not recognized - Hazard(s) Not Recognized Hazard(s) not recognized by employees involved in the task. Example: Dropped object hazard(s) not recognized by the crew.
Stored Energy (Mech. Equip., Non-Electrical) control(s) not identified - Control(s) Not Identified Control(s) not identified for the recognized hazard(s) Example: The crew did not identify the need for tethers, C.A.Z. (Controlled Access Zone), etc., to protect from recognized dropped object hazards.
Stored Energy (Mech. Equip., Non-Electrical) control(s) not implemented - Control(s) Not Implemented Identified control(s) were not implemented. Example: C.A.Z. identified as a control for dropped object hazard(s), but not established (implemented).
Stored Energy (Mech. Equip., Non-Electrical) control(s) not executed - Control(s) Not Executed Implemented control(s) were not properly executed. Example: C.A.Z. was established but not enforced (executed).
315. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
316. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
317. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
318. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
319. Personnel protected from the release of stored energy? (Systems - Non-electrical)
List Radio
Stored energy identified Designed for intended use Inspected and maintained Line of fire protection in place (PPE, barricading, spacing) Proper safeguards established for release of energy “Zero energy” tested prior to continuing work
Yes
No
Not applicable
320. Stored Energy (Systems - Non-electrical) - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Identify stored energy
Ensure system is designed for intended use
Inspect and maintain system
Implement line of fire protection (PPE, barricading, spacing)
Establish proper safeguards for release of energy
Ensure “Zero energy”, test prior to continuing work
321. Reason for lack of Stored Energy controls (Systems- Non-electrical)
List Radio
Stored Energy (Systems, Non-Electrical) hazard(s) not recognized - Hazard(s) Not Recognized Hazard(s) not recognized by employees involved in the task. Example: Dropped object hazard(s) not recognized by the crew.
Stored Energy (Systems, Non-Electrical) control(s) not identified - Control(s) Not Identified Control(s) not identified for the recognized hazard(s) Example: The crew did not identify the need for tethers, C.A.Z. (Controlled Access Zone), etc., to protect from recognized dropped object hazards.
Stored Energy (Systems, Non-Electrical) control(s) not implemented - Control(s) Not Implemented Identified control(s) were not implemented. Example: C.A.Z. identified as a control for dropped object hazard(s), but not established (implemented).
Stored Energy (Systems, Non-Electrical) control(s) not executed - Control(s) Not Executed Implemented control(s) were not properly executed. Example: C.A.Z. was established but not enforced (executed).
322. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
323. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
324. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
325. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
16. STCKY Causal Analysis: S#!t That's Built in Confined Spaces
click to collapse/expand
326. Confined Space Identification
List Radio
"Confined space" means a space that: (1) Is large enough and so configured that an employee can bodily enter and perform assigned work; and (2) Has limited or restricted means for entry or exit (for example, tanks, vessels, silos, storage bins, hoppers, vaults, and pits are spaces that may have limited means of entry.); and (3) Is not designed for continuous employee occupancy. "Non-permit confined space" means a confined space that does not contain or, with respect to atmospheric hazards, have the potential to contain any hazard capable of causing death or serious physical harm. "Permit-required confined space (permit space)" means a confined space that has one or more of the following characteristics: (1) Contains or has a potential to contain a hazardous atmosphere; (2) Contains a material that has the potential for engulfing an entrant; (3) Has an internal configuration such that an entrant could be trapped or asphyxiated by inwardly converging walls or by a floor which slopes downward and tapers to a smaller cross-section; or (4) Contains any other recognized serious safety or health hazard.
Non-permit Required
Permit Required
327. Space's air tested to verify Non-Permit classification?
List Radio
Air tested to verify no atmospheric hazards present.
Yes
No
328. Non-permit required Confined Space: Air Testing - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Verify "Non-Permit" classification with air testing
Review permit. Test atmosphere. Re-classify confined space
329. Reason for lack of air testing
List Radio
Air Monitoring(s) not recognized
Air Monitoring(s) not identified
Air Monitoring(s) not implemented
Air Monitoring(s) not executed
330. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
331. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
332. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
333. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
334. Permit Required Confined Space: Hazardous atmosphere controls in place?
List Radio
Air Monitoring: Confined space air tested prior to entry and monitored during shift with calibrated monitor Adequate ventilation maintained
Yes
No
335. Permit Required Confined Space: Hazardous Atmosphere Controls - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Test confined space air with calibrated air monitor
Provide adequate ventilation
336. Reason for lack of hazardous atmosphere controls
List Radio
Air Monitoring(s) not recognized
Air Monitoring(s) not identified
Air Monitoring(s) not implemented
Air Monitoring(s) not executed
337. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
338. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
339. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
340. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
341. Non-permit Required Confined Space: Safe access provided into space?
List Radio
Safe Access: PPE and equipment for safe entry available Employees properly using entry equipment https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2015-05-04 (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/federalregister/2015-05-04)
Yes
No
342. Non-permit Required Confined Space: Safe access - Corrective Action
List Checkbox
Provide PPE and equipment for safe entry
Train employees in use of PPE
343. Reason for lack of confined space access
List Radio
Safe access hazard(s) not recognized
Safe access control(s) not identified
Safe access control(s) not implemented
Safe access control(s) not executed
344. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
345. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
346. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
347. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
348. Permit Required Confined Space: Safe access provided into permit required space?
List Radio
Safe Access: Required signage and permitting in place PPE and equipment for safe entry available Employees properly using entry equipment Confined Space Attendant stationed outside during operations https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.146 (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.146)
Yes
No
349. Permit Required Confined Space: Safe access - Corrective Action
List Checkbox
Post required signage and complete permitting
Provide PPE and equipment for safe entry
Train employees on use of PPE
Provide Confined Space Attendant at access during operations
350. Reason for lack of safe access into confined space
List Radio
Safe access hazard(s) not recognized
Safe access control(s) not identified
Safe access control(s) not implemented
Safe access control(s) not executed
351. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
352. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
353. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
354. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
355. Permit Required Confined Space: Method of communication with entrants established and maintained?
List Radio
Radio or visual means of communication established with entrants tested and verified
Yes
No
356. Permit Required Confined Space: Method of communication - Corrective Action
List Checkbox
Establish means of radio or visual communication with entrants
Test communication system
357. Reason for lack of communication method
List Radio
Communication(s) not recognized
Communication(s) not identified
Communication(s) not implemented
Communication(s) not executed
358. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
359. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
360. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
361. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
362. Permit Required Confined Space: Emergency Procedures in place?
List Radio
Emergency Response: Emergency numbers available Rescue equipment available
Yes
No
363. Permit Required Confined Space: Emergency Procedures - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Post emergency numbers
Secure rescue equipment
364. Reason for lack of emergency procedures
List Radio
Emergency Response not recognized
Emergency Response not identified
Emergency Response not implemented
Emergency Response not executed
365. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
366. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
367. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
368. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
17. STCKY Causal Analysis: S#!t That's Built Underground
click to collapse/expand
369. Utility strike prevention measures in place?
List Radio
Active, refreshed dig ticket Service/lateral lines are located. Existing Utilities are located and marked Potholing used to verify the location and depth of the utility Potholed utilities marked, protected, supported, or removed
Yes
No
Not applicable
370. Utility Strike Prevention - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Activate or refresh dig ticket
Locate service/lateral lines
Locate and mark existing utilities
Pothole to verify the location and depth of the utility
Mark, protect, support, or remove verified utilities
371. Reason for lack of utility strike prevention measures
List Radio
Utility Strike hazard(s) not recognized
Utility Strike control(s) not identified
Utility Strike control(s) not implemented
Utility Strike control(s) not executed
372. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
373. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
374. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
375. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
376. Atmosphere within excavation verified as safe for work?
List Radio
Atmosphere within the excavation tested Testing conducted at regular intervals to ensure that the atmosphere remains safe Precautions taken to protect employees from exposure to hazardous atmospheres Emergency equipment readily available Employees trained to use personal protective and rescue equipment
Yes
No
377. Atmosphere within excavation - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Test atmosphere within the excavation
Conduct testing at regular intervals to ensure that the atmosphere remains safe
Take precautions to protect employees from exposure to hazardous atmospheres
Provide Emergency equipment and make readily available
Train employees to use personal protective and rescue equipment
378. Reason for lack of excavation air testing
List Radio
Environmental hazard(s) not recognized
Environmental control(s) not identified
Environmental control(s) not implemented
Environmental control(s) not executed
379. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
380. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
381. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
382. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
383. Safe access to the work area?
List Radio
Safe means of access/egress available? Provide safe means of access/egress for workers in trench/excavations 4’ or deeper Provide safe access/egress available within 25‘ of lateral travel Bridges with handrails across trenches wider than 30” Relentless Housekeeping - Maintain access/egress clear of obstructions Install Barricade/Flagging/Fencing 6ft. from leading edge Provide Fall protection available for workers near leading edge Ladders – Access/Egress free from obstructions, tripping hazards No damage on rails or rungs At least a Type 1A (rated for up to 300 pounds) Constructed of nonconductive material Setup at a 4/1 angle Secured/tied off to prevent movement Extend 3ft beyond landing area or have “pass through” gate Protected from fall exposure by means of a controlled access point Be used per the manufacturer’s instructions For more information see: https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053 (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053)
Yes
No
Not applicable
384. Safe access - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Install Barricade/Flagging/Fencing 6ft. from leading edge
Provide Fall protection available for workers near leading edge
Provide safe means of access/egress for workers in trench/excavations 4’ or deeper
Provide safe access/egress available within 25' of lateral travel
Ramps - Relentless Housekeeping - Maintain access/egress clear of obstructions
Ladders - Relentless Housekeeping - Maintain access/egress clear of obstructions
Replace ladder
Utilize ladder meeting Type 1A (rated for up to 300 pounds)
Supply ladder constructed of nonconductive material
Setup ladder at a 4/1 angle
Secure/tie off ladder to prevent movement
Extend ladder 3ft beyond landing area or have “pass through” gate
Protect workers from fall exposure by means of a controlled access point
Use ladder per the manufacturer’s instructions
Install bridges with handrails across trenches wider than 30”
385. Reason for lack of safe excavation access
List Radio
Safe access hazard(s) not recognized
Safe access control(s) not identified
Safe access control(s) not implemented
Safe access control(s) not executed
386. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
387. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
388. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
389. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
390. Cave-in protection in place?
List Radio
Cave in protection - Excavations 5’ deep or greater have protective system Excavations greater than 20’ designed by professional engineer Spoils, materials, and equipment set back at least 2’ excavation edge Loose rock or soil at excavation face sealed back Accumulation of water controlled Sloping / Benching – Sloping/Benching appropriate for soil classification Type A Soil - ¾:1 If 12’ or less and open for less than 24 hrs. Type B Soil – 1:1 Type C Soil - 1 ½:1 (type C soil cannot be benched) Trench Box or Shield – Tabulated Data on site Box placed to prevent lateral movement Box extends 18” above excavation Box no more than 24” from bottom of excavation Hydraulic Shoring – Tabulated Data on site Horizontal spacing per tabulated data (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053)
Yes
No
Not applicable
391. Cave in Protection - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Install protective system for excavations 5’ deep or greater
Secure design document for excavations greater than 20'
Set back spoils, materials, and equipment least 2’ excavation edge
Seal back loose rock or soil at excavation face
Prevent accumulation of water
Ensure sloping/benching appropriate for soil classification
Type A Soil - ¾:1 If 12’ or less and open for less than 24 hrs.
Type B Soil – 1:1
Type C Soil - 1 ½:1 (type C soil cannot be benched)
Ensure tabulated data on site
Place box to prevent lateral movement
Position box to extend 18” above excavation
Position box so that it is no more than 24” from bottom of excavation
Hydraulic Shoring - Ensure Tabulated Data on site
Hydraulic Shoring - Install horizontal spacing per tabulated data
392. Reason for lack of cave-in protection
List Radio
Cave in hazard(s) not recognized
Cave in control(s) not identified
Cave in control(s) not implemented
Cave in control(s) not executed
393. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
394. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
395. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
396. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
18. STCKY Causal Analysis: S#!t That's Moves or Crushes
click to collapse/expand
397. Ground personnel protected from moving jobsite equipment?
List Radio
Equipment logistics plan in place and executed First move forward being utilized Separate access routes for equipment and personnel established Properly trained and positioned spotters (if required) Blind spots identified and protected Crush points identified and protected Ground personnel using positive visual confirmation before approaching equipment (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053)
Yes
No
Not applicable
398. Protection from moving jobsite equipment - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Develop and implement logistics plan
Implement First move forward
Establish separate access routes for equipment and personnel
Train and position spotters (if required)
Identify and protect blind spots
Identify and protect crush points
Implement positive visual confirmations for ground personnel before approaching equipment
399. Reason for lack of protection for ground personnel
List Radio
Moving Equipment hazard(s) not recognized
Moving Equipment control(s) not identified
Moving Equipment control(s) not implemented
Moving Equipment control(s) not executed
400. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
401. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
402. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
403. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
404. Workers protected while working near/adjacent to live traffic?
List Radio
Traffic control plan in place Equipment/Vehicles positioned to protect workers Workers wearing all required PPE Safe access to work zone available (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053)
Yes
No
Not applicable
405. Working near/adjacent to live traffic - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Implement approved Traffic control plan
Position Equipment/Vehicles to protect workers from live traffic
Provide required PPE
Provide Safe access to work zone
406. Reason for lack of protection from live traffic
List Radio
Live Traffic hazard(s) not recognized
Live Traffic control(s) not identified
Live Traffic control(s) not implemented
Live Traffic control(s) not executed
407. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
408. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
409. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
410. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
411. Safe procedures in place for work/travel near overhead utilities?
List Radio
Traffic control plan in place Equipment/Vehicles positioned to protect workers Workers wearing all required PPE Safe access to work zone available (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053)
Yes
No
Not applicable
412. Work/travel near overhead utilities - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Conduct planning meeting (discuss de-energizing lines)
Erect signs and barricades
Erect warning lines
Provide Non-conductive tag lines
Designate spotter as required
Ensure minimum clearance distance per Table A
413. Reason for lack of protection near overhead utilities
List Radio
Overhead Utility hazard(s) not recognized
Overhead Utility control(s) not identified
Overhead Utility control(s) not implemented
Overhead Utility control(s) not executed
414. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
415. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
416. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
417. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
19. STCKY Causal Analysis: S#!t That's Hazardous
click to collapse/expand
418. Safe handling, use, and storage of hazardous materials?
List Radio
SDS available and reviewed Appropriate PPE identified, provided, and in use Spill/emergency response procedures in place (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053)
Yes
No
Not applicable
419. Handling and use of hazardous materials - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Provide and review SDS
Obtain and provide appropriate PPE
Develop and implement emergency spill procedures
Post required signage and labels
Implement fire protection measures
Eliminate ignition sources
Properly store hazardous material per SDS
420. Reason for lack of hazmat protocols
List Radio
Hazardous Material hazard(s) not recognized
Hazardous Material control(s) not identified
Hazardous Material control(s) not implemented
Hazardous Material control(s) not executed
421. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
422. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
423. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
424. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
425. Heat illness prevention measures in place?
List Radio
Project specific procedures for heat illness prevention being followed Ice is available Cool water is available within reasonable walking distance Rehydration drinks/pops/powders available Heat illness kit available Shade provided close to the work area OSHA - Heat Illness Prevention: https://www.osha.gov/heat (https://www.osha.gov/heat) OSHA – NIOSH Heat Safety Tool - Download: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/osha-niosh-heat-safety-tool/id1239425102 (https://apps.apple.com/us/app/osha-niosh-heat-safety-tool/id1239425102) (https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1926/1926.1053)
Yes
No
Not applicable
426. Heat Illness Prevention - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Develop Project specific procedures for heat illness prevention
Provide ice
Provide cool water within reasonable walking distance
Get a heat illness kit for emergency response
Set up shade area close to the work area
427. Reason for lack of heat illness prevention
List Radio
Heat Illness hazard(s) not recognized
Heat Illness control(s) not identified
Heat Illness control(s) not implemented
Heat Illness control(s) not executed
428. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
429. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
430. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
431. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
20. STCKY Causal Analysis: S#!t That's Energized
click to collapse/expand
432. Tools, cords, and leads in proper condition?
List Radio
Rated for intended use Cord insulation intact Properly grounded
Yes
No
Not applicable
433. Tools, cords, and leads - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Obtain tools, cords, and leads rated for intended use
Repair cord insulation by qualified person
Properly ground tools, cords, and leads
434. Reason for lack of tools, cords, or leads condition
List Radio
Tool, cord, lead hazard(s) not recognized
Tool, cord, lead control(s) not identified
Tool, cord, lead control(s) not implemented
Tool, cord, lead control(s) not executed
435. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
436. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
437. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
438. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
439. Electrical sources, generators, welders, light plants safe to use?
List Radio
Rated for intended use Grounded and/or functional GFCI Conductors insulated or protected from contact
Yes
No
Not applicable
440. Electrical sources, generators, welders, light plants - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Obtain tools, cords, and leads rated for intended use
Ground equipment or install functional GFCI
Insulate or protect conductors from contact
441. Reason for lack of electrical protection (sources, generators, welders, light plants)
List Radio
Electrical Sources hazard(s) not recognized
Electrical Sources control(s) not identified
Electrical Sources control(s) not implemented
Electrical Sources control(s) not executed
442. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
443. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
444. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
445. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
446. Energized systems procedures in place?
List Radio
Correct PPE provided for operation Work performed by qualified person Hazardous or residual energy identified and locked out System/Equipment has been “zero energy” tested prior to work
Yes
No
Not applicable
447. Energized systems procedures - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Provide correct PPE for operation
Assign work to qualified person
Identify and Lock Out hazardous or residual energy
Test system/equipment for "zero" energy
448. Reason for lack of energized systems procedures
List Radio
Energized System hazard(s) not recognized
Energized System control(s) not identified
Energized System control(s) not implemented
Energized System control(s) not executed
449. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
450. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
451. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
452. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
21. STCKY Causal Analysis: S#!t That Lifts
click to collapse/expand
453. Load Handling Equipment Classification
List Radio
Cranes
Other Load Handling Devices (equipment with forks, hoists, etc)
454. Required Crane set up procedures in place?
List Radio
Underground hazards identified and marked Ground rated for load Ground conditions firm, drained, and graded Outriggers extended as required by load chart Floats level, cribbing/matting sufficient Swing radius protection in place
Yes
No
455. Cranes Set Up - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Identify and mark underground hazards
Verify ground is rated for load
Ensure ground conditions are safe for operation
Extend outriggers as required by load chart
Ensure Floats are level and cribbing/matting is sufficient
Protect swing radius barricade
456. Reason for lack of crane set up
List Radio
Crane Set Up hazard(s) not recognized
Crane Set Up control(s) not identified
Crane Set Up control(s) not implemented
Crane Set Up control(s) not executed
457. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
458. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
459. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
460. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
461. Safe procedures for work near overhead utilities? (Cranes)
List Radio
Overhead Utilities: For work near powerlines: All of the following must be met: Planning meeting (discuss de-energizing lines) Signs and barricades Non-conductive tag lines Warning lines erected Spotter required Encroachment Precautions for operations up to 350kV: At Least One of These Additional Measures Proximity alarm Range control warning device Range control prevention device Insulating link Table A – Minimum Powerline Clearance Distances – Operation Voltage Distance 0 to 50 kV 10 ft 50 to 200 kV 15 ft 200 to 350 kV 20 ft 350 to 500 kV 25 ft 500 to 750 kV 35 ft 750 to 1000 kV 45 ft
Yes
No
Not applicable
462. Work near overhead utilities - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Conduct planning meeting (discuss de-energizing lines)
Erect signs and barricades
Erect warning lines
Provide Non-conductive tag lines
Designate spotter as required
Ensure minimum clearance distance per Table A
463. Reason for lack of protection near overhead utilities (Cranes)
List Radio
Overhead Utilities hazard(s) not recognized
Overhead Utilities control(s) not identified
Overhead Utilities control(s) not implemented
Overhead Utilities control(s) not executed
464. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
465. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
466. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
467. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
468. Adequate execution of lift plan? (Cranes)
List Radio
Known weight of load Known Capacity of load handling equipment Anti-Two-Block Functional Rigging inspected and adequate for task Controlled lift zone Tag lines Designated signal person Qualified rigger Overhead load alert
Yes
No
469. Execution of lift plan - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Determine/Verify weight of load
Determine capacity of load handling equipment
Install Anti-Two-Block device
Replace rigging
Establish controlled lift zone
Provide tag lines
Designate qualified signal person
Assign qualified rigger
Establish overhead load alert system
Use the correct signal method
470. Reason for lack of executing lift plan (Cranes)
List Radio
Load Handling hazard(s) not recognized
Load Handling control(s) not identified
Load Handling control(s) not implemented
Load Handling control(s) not executed
471. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
472. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
473. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
474. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
475. Required Load Handling Equipment set up procedures in place? (Other than Cranes)?
List Radio
Ground conditions sufficient for task Outriggers extended as required by load chart Lifting equipment level during lift Spotter or C.A.Z in place as needed Using manufacturer approved lifting points
Yes
No
476. Load Handling Equipment set up procedures - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Improve ground conditions
Extend outriggers per load chart
Ensure lifting equipment is level
Set up Spotter or C.A.Z as needed
Use manufacturer approved lifting points
477. Reason for lack of set up procedures for load handling equipment
List Radio
Lift Set Up hazard(s) not recognized
Lift Set Up control(s) not identified
Lift Set Up control(s) not implemented
Lift Set Up control(s) not executed
478. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
479. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
480. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
481. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
482. Safe procedures for work near overhead utilities (OLHD)?
List Radio
Overhead Utilities (OLHD): Encroachment Precautions for operations up to 350kV: All of the following must be met: Planning meeting (discuss de-energizing lines) Signs and barricades Non-conductive tag lines Warning lines erected Spotter required Table A – Minimum Powerline Clearance Distances – Operation Voltage Distance 0 to 50 kV 10 ft 50 to 200 kV 15 ft 200 to 350 kV 20 ft 350 to 500 kV 25 ft 500 to 750 kV 35 ft 750 to 1000 kV 45 ft
Yes
No
Not applicable
483. Work near overhead utilities (OLHD) - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Conduct planning meeting (discuss de-energizing lines)
Erect signs and barricades
Erect warning lines
Provide Non-conductive tag lines
Designate spotter as required
Ensure minimum clearance distance per Table A
484. Reason for lack of procedures while lifting near overhead utilities (OLHD)
List Radio
Overhead Utilities hazard(s) not recognized
Overhead Utilities control(s) not identified
Overhead Utilities control(s) not implemented
Overhead Utilities control(s) not executed
485. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
486. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
487. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
488. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
489. Adequate execution of lift procedures? (OLHD)
List Radio
Known weight of load Known Capacity of load handling equipment Rigging inspected and adequate for task Controlled lift zone Tag lines as required Designated signal person as required Qualified rigger as required
Yes
No
Not applicable
490. Execution of lift procedures - Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Determine/Verify weight of load
Determine capacity of load handling equipment
Replace rigging
Establish controlled lift zone
Provide tag lines as required
Designate qualified signal person as required
Assign qualified rigger as required
491. Reason for lack of safe lifting
List Radio
Load Handling hazard(s) not recognized
Load Handling control(s) not identified
Load Handling control(s) not implemented
Load Handling control(s) not executed
492. What prevented the hazard from being recognized? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Primary STCKY Energy not recognized
Lack of Knowledge
Inadequate training
Lack of awareness
Insufficient risk assessment
Rushed planning or inadequate preparation
Lack of communication
Inadequate hazard identification process
Unclear responsibilities
Assumptions and biases
External factors
493. What prevented the control from being identified? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Lack of familiarity with specific high energy hazards - The project team is not familiar with the specific high energy hazards present in the task, i.e. new or unique situation or work process.
Inadequate training on high energy controls - Team members have not received sufficient training on identifying, implementing, and executing high energy controls.
Insufficient risk assessment - The team has not conducted a thorough risk assessment to identify all potential high energy hazards and determine appropriate controls.
Lack of available control options - The team struggles to find suitable control measures for mitigating the identified high energy hazards, leading to delays or inadequate solutions.
Resource constraints - Limited budget or access to equipment prevented the implementation of high energy controls
Time constraints - Project deadlines and tight schedules pressure the team to overlook or rush the identification of high energy controls.
Risk Tolerance - The team has dealt with similar high energy hazards in the past without incident and assumed the risks are manageable without additional controls.
Emphasis on production - A focus on productivity and meeting targets led to neglecting the thorough identification of high energy controls.
Lack of communication and collaboration - Team members did not communicate effectively, critical information about high energy hazards and controls were missed.
Failure to learn from past incidents - The team did not learn from previous incidents involving similar high energy hazards, leading to repeated oversights in control identification.
Complexity of the construction task - Highly complex task with multiple high energy hazards, made it challenging for the team to identify and implement appropriate controls for each hazard.
494. What prevented the control from being implemented? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Cost considerations - High energy controls are expensive to acquire and install, and the project team prioritized cost savings over worker safety.
Lack of understanding or awareness - The team did not fully comprehend the severity of the hazard or the potential consequences of not implementing the high energy controls.
Resistance to change - Introduction of controls or procedures was met with resistance from workers or management who prefer familiar practices.
Inadequate planning - The team identified the need for high energy control but failed to develop a proper plan for their implementation.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources, such as equipment or skilled personnel, to implement the high energy controls effectively.
Time constraints - Project timelines or deadlines did not allow for implementing high energy controls properly.
Lack of leadership support - The absence of leadership support in prioritizing control implementation made it challenging for the team to effectively implement the controls.
Perceived inconvenience - Workers considered the high energy controls as inconvenient or cumbersome, leading to resistance in their implementation.
Risk Tolerance - The project team believes that the hazard is manageable without additional controls or that accidents are unlikely to happen.
Inadequate training - Workers lack the necessary training on how to use or maintain the high energy controls effectively.
Miscommunication or misinterpretation - Instructions or guidelines for implementing the controls have not been communicated clearly or were misunderstood by the team
495. What prevented the control from being executed? Select all that apply.
List Checkbox
Inadequate training - The team have not received sufficient training on how to use the high energy control properly
Lack of supervision - Lacking supervision, workers did not follow the correct procedures for using the high energy control.
Risk Tolerance - Workers became complacent over time and deviated from established procedures
Lack of accountability - No consequences for non-compliance with high energy control procedures
Failure to maintain equipment - Lack of regular maintenance and/or inspections of the high energy control led to malfunction and/or reduced effectiveness.
Miscommunication or misunderstandings - Poor communication between team members resulted in misunderstandings about how to execute the high energy control.
Production pressures - Workers prioritized production over control execution, due to tight project schedule or deadlines, leading to incomplete execution of the high energy control.
Resource constraints - The team lacked the necessary resources to ensure high energy control execution.
Lack of awareness - Workers did understand the importance of high energy control or the potential consequences of not executing it effectively.
Worker fatigue - Fatigued workers were not alert or attentive when executing high energy controls.
Competing priorities - Other tasks or issues diverted the team’s attention away from executing the high energy control.
Willful disregard - Intentional neglect or avoidance of necessary actions or procedures
22. Causal Analysis - Safeguard Review
click to collapse/expand
Ask these questions about the person who was most involved in the incident.
496. Was a regulation or company policy violated?
List Radio
Yes
No
TBD / Answer Pending
497. Was there intent to cause harm?
List Radio
Yes
No
498. Did a distraction contribute to the incident?
List Radio
Yes
No
499. Causal Factor: Lapse. Corrective Actions: Remove distraction, provide coaching on hazard recognition/awareness.
Text Label
500. Was this a new situation where typical practices were followed?
List Radio
Example - A new construction material was installed using typical practices for other materials.
Yes
No
501. Causal Factor: Intrusion (of a new situation when typical practices were followed). Corrective Actions: Coach on hazard recognition/awareness, revise work plan.
Text Label
502. Was a necessary step left out of the procedure?
List Radio
For example- The task's JHA did not identify a critical step.
Yes
No
503. Causal Factor: Omission. Corrective Actions: Revise work plan. Coach on Hazard recognition and risk tolerance.
Text Label
504. Is the intent behind the action known?
List Radio
Do we actually know why the person chose to do what they did?
Yes
No
505. Causal Factor: Reduced Intention. Corrective Action: Coach on safe choices.
Text Label
506. Was a sequence of tasks mistimed?
List Radio
Yes
No
507. Causal Factor: Mistiming. Corrective Action: Revise work plan, coach on hazard recognition and safe practices.
Text Label
508. Causal Factor: Unclassified. Corrective Action: N/A
Text Label
509. Was there a rule/procedure AGAINST the action?
List Radio
Yes
No
510. Was it possible to follow safe practices?
List Radio
Yes
No
511. Did jobsite pressure drive disregard?
List Radio
Yes
No
512. Causal Factor: Uncontrolled Situation. Corrective Action: Support choice, revise work plan
Text Label
513. Causal Factor: Jobsite Pressure. Corrective Action: Coach on Speak Up, Listen Up
Text Label
514. Was choice made due to a high tolerance for risk?
List Radio
Yes
No
515. Causal Factor: Jobsite pressure. Corrective Action: Coach on choices, coach on Speak Up, Listen Up
Text Label
516. Causal Factor: High Risk Tolerance . Corrective Action: Coach, discipline, re-train
Text Label
517. Was there a rule/procedure FOR the action?
List Radio
Yes
No
518. Was the rule/procedure good in some circumstances?
List Radio
Yes
No
519. Causal Factor: Mistake- Application of a bad rule/procedure. Corrective Action: Provide training on hazard recognition and safe practices. Revise the work plan.
Text Label
520. Causal Factor: Mistake- Misapplication of a good rule/procedure. Corrective Action: Provide training on hazard recognition and safe practices. Revise the work plan.
Text Label
521. Causal Factor: Mistake- Knowledge-based mistake. Corrective Action: Provide training on hazard recognition and safe practices. Revise the work plan.
Text Label
522. Additional corrective actions to be taken by our Sundt Project Management Team:
List Checkbox
Plan the work, work the plan - Sundt project management to: revise work plans, schedules, etc. verified work is completed in accordance with plans
Engage our workforce - Speak with workers / personnel about matters learned during this incident review process
Walk our jobsites - Sundt project management to conduct more frequent STCKY Walks and safety inspections
Coach our teams - Sundt project management to sponsor, hold, or conduct training on matters related to this incident.
Own Relentless Housekeeping - Sundt project management to increase housekeeping efforts
Report and manage incidents - Sundt project management to re-enforce/emphasize the importance of incident reporting during meetings, training, etc.
None - n/a
523. Do other Causal Factors apply to this incident?
List Checkbox
Competence/Training/Knowledge Transfer
Standards, Policies, Programs, Processes
Leadership
Contractor Selection & Management
Continuous Improvement
Equipment, Materials, Environment
None - n/a
524. Competence/Training/Knowledge Transfer: Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Refine employee selection process
Refine onboarding / orientation process
Conduct analysis of training needs
Refine training program
Refine presentation of training
Ensure adequate recordkeeping of training
Ensure adequate refresher training
Ensure sufficient training resources
Provide training
525. Standards, Policies, Programs, Processes: Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Update HSE System Manual - Latest version (https://www.sundt.com/downloads/#safetydownloads)
Update Project HSE Plan - Latest template (https://www.sundt.com/downloads/#safetydownloads)
Update HSEMP or other SOP
526. Leadership: Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Clearly define responsibility / accountability / expectations
Effectively communicate responsibility / accountability / expectations
Clearly define communication within reporting relationships
Ensure leaders set a good safety example
Ensure leaders demonstrate commitment to safety
527. Contractor Selection & Management: Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Enhance process for contractor prequalification
Ensure prequalification of contractors
Ensure adequate contractor selected
Effectively engage contractors
528. Continuous Improvement: Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Capture lessons learned and trends
Communicate lessons learned and trends
Act on lessons learned and trends
529. Equipment, Materials, Environment: Corrective Actions
List Checkbox
Ensure safe design
Ensure safe arrangement
Ensure purchasing protocols are followed
Ensure adequate maintenance is conducted
Ensure adequate condition
Ensure availability
Ensure safe work area
530. Division of Work that had a Design Problem
List Drop-down
What was the scope/division of work that caused/contributed to the incident? If a plumber doing roof drains fell over a roof parapet that was shorter than guardrail height, the Division would be roofing which is 07 Thermal and Moisture Protection (not plumbing)
Select...
0 Not related to a scope of work - N/A
00 TBD / Answer Pending
00 00 00 - General Conditions & General Requirements
02 00 00 - Existing Conditions
03 00 00 - Concrete
04 00 00 - Masonry
05 00 00 - Metals
06 00 00 - Wood, Plastics, and Composites
07 00 00 - Thermal and Moisture Protection
08 00 00 - Openings
09 00 00 - Finishes
10 00 00 - Specialties
11 00 00 - Equipment
12 00 00 - Furnishings
13 00 00 - Special Construction
14 00 00 - Conveying Equipment
21 00 00 - Fire Suppression
22 00 00 - Plumbing
23 00 00 - Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
25 50 00 - Integrated Automation Facility Controls
26 00 00 - Electrical
27 00 00 - Communications
28 00 00 - Electronic Safety & Security
31 00 00 - Earthwork
32 00 00 - Exterior Improvements
33 00 00 - Utilities
34 00 00 - Transportation
40 00 00 - Process Interconnections
41 00 00 - Material Processing & Handling Equipment
42 00 00 - Process Heating/Cooling/Drying Equipment
43 00 00 - Process Gas & Liquid Handling/Purification/Storage Equipment
44 00 00 - Pollution & Waste Control Equipment
45 00 00 - Industry-Specific Manufacturing Equipment
46 00 00 - Water & Wastewater Equipment
48 00 00 - Electrical Power Generation
531. Optional: Causal Analysis Details
Text Long
23. Attachments, Documentation, Photos
click to collapse/expand
532. Attachments / References / Photos / Documentation
Attachment
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
533. Confidential Attachments
Attachment
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
24. Misc Details
click to collapse/expand
534. Optional: Did anyone assist with this report?
Choice
If incident was an inspection by a regulatory agency, list the personnel who participated in the inspection process.
Yes
No
535. Participants (aside from you)
People
Select internal participants here. For personnel not listed, use the next field.
536. Other Participants
Text Short
Type out any other participants' name & company.
537. Optional: Was the incident witnessed?
List Radio
Witnessed
Not witnessed
538. Authorities
Choice
Regulatory / Responding agencies (i.e., OSHA, Police Dept, Fire Dept, etc)
Authorities involved
No authorities involved
25. Authorities
click to collapse/expand
539. Authority/Dept
List Radio
DPS - Department of Public Safety
Police Department
Fire Department
EMS - Emergency Medical Services
Federal Law Enforcement Agency
Other Agency – Describe Below
540. Name of Authority/Dept
Text Short
541. Officer Name
Text Short
542. Badge Number
Text Short
543. Complaint/Report/Inspection Number
Text Short
544. How many citations were issued?
List Radio
0
1
2
3
TBD
26. Inspection by Regulatory Agency
click to collapse/expand
545. Regulatory Agency
List Drop-down
Select...
DOT / Fed - Department of Transportation
DOT / State - State Department of Transportation
EPA / Fed - Environmental Protection Agency
EPA / State - State Environmental Protection Agencies
MSHA / Fed - Mine Safety and Health Administration
MSHA / State - State Mining Agencies
OSHA / Fed - Occupational Safety and Health Administration
OSHA / State - State Occupational Safety and Health Agencies
State DEQ - State Department of Environmental Quality
Local Municipality - Local Municipal Authorities
FRA - Federal Railroad Administration
Railroad Commissions - State Railroad Commissions
Other Regulatory Agency - Write in text box
546. Name of Regulatory Agency
Text Short
547. State
List Drop-down
Select...
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
548. Complaint/Report/Inspection Number
Text Short
549. Compliance Officer Name
Text Short
550. Badge Number
Text Short
551. Reason for Inspection
List Drop-down
Select...
Compliance Inspections
Monitoring Inspections
Complaint Response Inspections
Permitting Inspections
Emergency Response Inspections
IDLH Inspections
Fatality/Accidents Inspections
Planned or Programmed Investigations
Special Emphasis Programs (SEPs)
Routine Roadside Inspection
Targeted Inspection Based on Safety Measurement System (SMS) Score
Post-Accident Inspection
Inspection Initiated by Complaint or Tip
Follow-up Inspection for Previous Non-Compliance
Frequent Inspection for Hazardous Material Carrier
Special Emphasis Inspection for Specific Safety Initiative
552. Inspection Status
List Drop-down
Select...
Open
Closed
553. How many citations were issued?
List Radio
0
1
2
3
TBD
554. Notes:
Text Long
555. Attachments
Attachment
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
556. Date and Time of Opening Conference
Date time
557. Opening Conference: Persons in attendance (provide company names for external parties)
Text Short
558. Was a search warrant presented?
Choice
Yes
No
559. Was the inspection based on a complaint?
Choice
Yes
No
560. What was the complaint?
Text Short
561. Inspection Duration
Text Short
562. Upload photos taken during inspection
Attachment
Be sure to take the same photographs from the same angle as the inspector
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
563. Date and Time of Closing Conference
Date time
564. Closing Conference: Persons in attendance (provide company names for external parties)
Text Short
27. Inspection by Regulatory Agency - Citation #1
click to collapse/expand
565. Issue Date
Date
566. Citation Status
List Radio
Open
Closed
567. Citation ID
Text Short
568. Standard Cited
Text Short
i.e., OSHA: 1138192.015
569. Citation Category
List Drop-down
Select...
Other-Than-Serious (OSHA)
Recordkeeping Violations (OSHA)
De Minimis (OSHA)
Serious (OSHA)
Repeated (OSHA)
Failure to Abate (OSHA)
Willful (OSHA)
Non-Significant and Substantial (MSHA)
Significant and Substantial (S&S) (MSHA)
Unwarrantable Failure (MSHA)
Imminent Danger (MSHA)
Flagrant Violations (MSHA)
Administrative Violations (EPA)
Statutory Violations (EPA)
Regulatory Violations (EPA)
Noncompliance (EPA)
Civil Penalties (EPA)
Criminal Penalties (EPA)
Hazardous Materials Violations (DOT)
Safety Violations (DOT)
Critical Violations (DOT)
Acute Violations (DOT)
Pattern of Violations (DOT)
570. Initial Fine
Number
571. Final outcome of citation
List Drop-down
Select...
Pending
Citation withdrawn
Warning Notice
Notice of Violation
Compliance Assistance Offered
Corrective Action Required
Mandatory Training or Education Required
Increased Monitoring or Oversight
Mandatory Re-Inspection
Fine or Penalty Levied
Settlement Agreement
Remediation Required
Public Notification Required
Environmental Cleanup Required
Operational Restrictions Imposed
License or Permit Suspension
Compliance Achievement Recognition
Order to Cease Operations
License or Permit Revocation
Legal Action Initiated
Civil Litigation Initiated
Criminal Charges Filed
572. Penalty Amount Paid
Number
573. Notes:
Text Long
28. Inspection by Regulatory Agency - Citation #2
click to collapse/expand
574. Issue Date
Date
575. Citation Status
List Radio
Open
Closed
576. Citation ID
Text Short
577. Standard Cited
Text Short
i.e., OSHA: 1138192.015
578. Citation Category
List Drop-down
Select...
Other-Than-Serious (OSHA)
Recordkeeping Violations (OSHA)
De Minimis (OSHA)
Serious (OSHA)
Repeated (OSHA)
Failure to Abate (OSHA)
Willful (OSHA)
Non-Significant and Substantial (MSHA)
Significant and Substantial (S&S) (MSHA)
Unwarrantable Failure (MSHA)
Imminent Danger (MSHA)
Flagrant Violations (MSHA)
Administrative Violations (EPA)
Statutory Violations (EPA)
Regulatory Violations (EPA)
Noncompliance (EPA)
Civil Penalties (EPA)
Criminal Penalties (EPA)
Hazardous Materials Violations (DOT)
Safety Violations (DOT)
Critical Violations (DOT)
Acute Violations (DOT)
Pattern of Violations (DOT)
579. Initial Fine
Number
580. Final outcome of citation
List Drop-down
Select...
Pending
Citation withdrawn
Warning Notice
Notice of Violation
Compliance Assistance Offered
Corrective Action Required
Mandatory Training or Education Required
Increased Monitoring or Oversight
Mandatory Re-Inspection
Fine or Penalty Levied
Settlement Agreement
Remediation Required
Public Notification Required
Environmental Cleanup Required
Operational Restrictions Imposed
License or Permit Suspension
Compliance Achievement Recognition
Order to Cease Operations
License or Permit Revocation
Legal Action Initiated
Civil Litigation Initiated
Criminal Charges Filed
581. Penalty Amount Paid
Number
582. Notes:
Text Long
29. Inspection by Regulatory Agency - Citation #3
click to collapse/expand
583. Issue Date
Date
584. Citation Status
List Radio
Open
Closed
585. Citation ID
Text Short
586. Standard Cited
Text Short
i.e., OSHA: 1138192.015
587. Citation Category
List Drop-down
Select...
Other-Than-Serious (OSHA)
Recordkeeping Violations (OSHA)
De Minimis (OSHA)
Serious (OSHA)
Repeated (OSHA)
Failure to Abate (OSHA)
Willful (OSHA)
Non-Significant and Substantial (MSHA)
Significant and Substantial (S&S) (MSHA)
Unwarrantable Failure (MSHA)
Imminent Danger (MSHA)
Flagrant Violations (MSHA)
Administrative Violations (EPA)
Statutory Violations (EPA)
Regulatory Violations (EPA)
Noncompliance (EPA)
Civil Penalties (EPA)
Criminal Penalties (EPA)
Hazardous Materials Violations (DOT)
Safety Violations (DOT)
Critical Violations (DOT)
Acute Violations (DOT)
Pattern of Violations (DOT)
588. Initial Fine
Number
589. Final outcome of citation
List Drop-down
Select...
Pending
Citation withdrawn
Warning Notice
Notice of Violation
Compliance Assistance Offered
Corrective Action Required
Mandatory Training or Education Required
Increased Monitoring or Oversight
Mandatory Re-Inspection
Fine or Penalty Levied
Settlement Agreement
Remediation Required
Public Notification Required
Environmental Cleanup Required
Operational Restrictions Imposed
License or Permit Suspension
Compliance Achievement Recognition
Order to Cease Operations
License or Permit Revocation
Legal Action Initiated
Civil Litigation Initiated
Criminal Charges Filed
590. Penalty Amount Paid
Number
591. Notes:
Text Long
30. Citation #1
click to collapse/expand
592. Citation ID
Text Short
593. Issue Date
Date
594. Standard Cited
Text Short
i.e., OSHA: 1138192.015
595. Category
Text Short
i.e., Other than serious
596. Penalty
Number
597. Status
List Radio
Closed
Open
Deleted
Pending withdrawal
Reduced to notice
Other
31. Citation #2
click to collapse/expand
598. Citation ID
Text Short
599. Issue Date
Date
600. Standard Cited
Text Short
i.e., OSHA: 1138192.015
601. Category
Text Short
i.e., Other than serious
602. Penalty
Number
603. Status
List Radio
Closed
Open
Deleted
Pending withdrawal
Reduced to notice
Other
32. Citation #3
click to collapse/expand
604. Citation ID
Text Short
605. Issue Date
Date
606. Standard Cited
Text Short
i.e., OSHA: 1138192.015
607. Category
Text Short
i.e., Other than serious
608. Penalty
Number
609. Status
List Radio
Closed
Open
Deleted
Pending withdrawal
Reduced to notice
Other
33. Witnesses
click to collapse/expand
If additional witness statements need to be inserted, this section can be duplicated-- click on "Copy Section". Interview Guidelines (https://www.csra.colorado.edu/_files/ugd/92d978_ffa43ea8f74a4ea383cd4b954414e4b2.pdf?index=true)
610. Copy section
Text
611. Witness Name & Company
Text Short
612. Witness Statement
Reference document
Use a computer to download the witness statement in Word format
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
613. Option 1: Upload witness statements as an attachment
Attachment
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
614. Option 2: Type/paste witness statements here
Text Long
Sample questions to ask if needed: When did the incident occur (date and time)? How was the task planned? Was there a THA or work plan for this operation? Was the THA being followed as written? Where were you when the incident occurred? Where were others located when the incident occurred? Did others witness the incident? Do you know their names? What events occurred just before the incident? When was the incident/leak/problem realized? How far along in the operation were you when the incident occurred? How did the incident occur / What happened? What equipment, material, or personnel were involved? Where was the equipment, material, tool? Where was the machine in its cycle? Who installed the equipment? What was damaged? Who and what was injured? What happened after the incident? How could this be prevented from recurring? How are you connected with others involved in the incident? Would you like to provide any additional information?
34. Contact
click to collapse/expand
615. Best point-of-contact for this incident
List Radio
Me
Non-Sundt Contact
Other Sundt Contact
Involved/Affected Party 1
Involved/Affected Party 2
Witness
616. Sundt Contact(s)
People
617. Contact (Name, Company, Phone/Email)
Text Short
35. STCKY Classification
click to collapse/expand
618. This incident is:
Text Label
619. STCKY
Text Label
620. Non-STCKY
Text Label
621. How STCKY Classification works
Reference document
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
622. Confirm the appropriate classification
List Radio
An incident must only have one official classification.
No applicable STCKY Classification
Non-STCKY Near Miss
Non-STCKY Damage
Non-STCKY Injury
STCKY Success
STCKY Luck Near Miss
STCKY Luck Damage
STCKY Luck Injury
STCKY Injury: Life Threatening
STCKY Injury: Life Altering
STCKY Injury: Life Ending
623. Notes/explanations/details on STCKY Classification (optional)
Text Short
36. Incident Review Level
click to collapse/expand
After completing the fields on the report, the Incident Level will populate accordingly.
624. Confirm the appropriate Incident Review Level
List Radio
An incident must only have one official Level.
Level 1 - Level 1 Review Meetings are optional... Criteria: Non-STCKY: injury, damage, near miss Job site first aid (incl On Site & Occucare) Trade partner personnel go to clinic and receive first aid Damage, theft, or vandalism up to $1k Minor spills (released more than incidental use) Invite: Project Team (Project Safety Manager, Superintendent, Project Manager, etc) Area/District/Group HSE Manager Project Executive
Level 2 - Criteria: STCKY Success (controls in place) STCKY Luck: injury, damage, or near miss Sundt personnel transported to clinic Trade contractor personnel treated at clinic for a recordable OSHA recordable injury Damage, theft, or vandalism over $1k Major spills (when govt reporting req’d) Notify: Supervisor, Safety Manager, Superintendent, Project Manager, Other project teammates Project Executive District/Group HSE Mgr Regional Director/District Manager Area/District Manager Paul Levin Invite: Project Team & Executive Regional Director/District Manager District/Group HSE Manager Group Manager Paul Levin
Level 3 - Criteria: STCKY Injury (life threatening/altering/ending) Personnel transported to hospital Lost-time injury OSHA reportable injury Member of public injured Business interruption caused by property damage Government Inspection (OSHA|MSHA|EPA) Notify: Supervisor, Safety Manager, Superintendent, Project Manager, Other project teammates Project Executive District/Group HSE Mgr Regional Director/District Manager Area/District Manager Paul Levin Group Manager Mike Hoover Ron Stuff Invite: Project Team & Executive Regional Director/District Manager District/Group HSE Manager Group Manager Paul Levin Mike Hoover
No Level - Criteria: Personal Medical Episode or Issue Sundt Driver Complaint STCKY Exposure Contact/Notify as relevant/appropriate: supervision of affected personnel Project Team (Project Safety Manager, Superintendent, Project Manager, etc) Area/District/Group HSE Manager Project Executive
625. STCKY Share
Reference document
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
37. Submit
click to collapse/expand
626. Exclude this incident from OSHA 300 log?
List Radio
Exclude
627. Exclude this incident from data collection, dashboarding, Snapshot, etc. ("Report Only")
List Radio
Exclude
628. Select project teammates to receive notification (optional)
People
629. Send for HSE review
Form flow button
Workflow action placeholder.
630. Send for Corporate review AND distribute initial notification
Form flow button
Workflow action placeholder.
631. Send back to project
Form flow button
Workflow action placeholder.
632. Approve and Close
Form flow button
Workflow action placeholder.
633. Send back to group
Form flow button
Workflow action placeholder.
38. Compass Data Centers - Additional Required Info
click to collapse/expand
634. Project Type
List Radio
Datacenter
635. Project Location
List Radio
Goodyear, AZ
El Mirage, AZ
636. Classification of Incident
Text Short
For example, "arc flash"
637. List all companies involved
Text Short
638. Problem Statement
Text Short
For example, " While performing L4 for PC 1F2 MSB an Arc flash Occurred"
639. Brief Description of Task Objective Prior to Incident
Text Short
For example, " ARC Flash during L4 on PC 1F2 MSB"
640. How many hours worked for the day prior to incident
Text Short
641. How many days worked consecutively prior to incident?
Text Short
642. Does the PTWP address the specific task involved in the incident?
Text Short
643. Were the proper tools and material used?
Text Short
644. Provide the detailed timeline of events (before, during, and post incident)
Text Label
645. Event time
Time
646. Event Description
Text Short
647. Event time
Time
648. Event Description
Text Short
649. Event time
Time
650. Event Description
Text Short
651. Event time
Time
652. Event Description
Text Short
653. Event time
Time
654. Event Description
Text Short
655. Event time
Time
656. Event Description
Text Short
657. Event time
Time
658. Event Description
Text Short
659. Event time
Time
660. Event Description
Text Short
661. Event time
Time
662. Event Description
Text Short
663. Event time
Time
664. Event Description
Text Short
665. Event time
Time
666. Event Description
Text Short
667. Event time
Time
668. Event Description
Text Short
669. Event time
Time
670. Event Description
Text Short
671. Event time
Time
672. Event Description
Text Short
673. Contributing Factors
Text Long
For example: 1.Wire removed for relocation of terminal block for better access of EC on site. 2. Terminal block mounted too low on some units which made termination difficult. 3. The block mounting location not specified on any drawing.
674. Root Cause
Text Short
For example, "Wire strands crossed phases on terminal block when relocated to accommodate the connection from the bottom."
675. Corrective Actions and Measures to Prevent Reoccurrence
Text Long
For example, 1. Review all GPZ Comm box for similar issues. SE site team In progress 2. Rework the comm box, replace wiring, terminal block, and breaker. SE site team Complete 3. Update terminal block mounting location on drawings. SE pre-fab engineer ongoing due 11/1/25 4. Review oversight and validation of contractor scope of work. Documentation to include inspection records.
39. Project-Level Incident Review Meeting
click to collapse/expand
Incident Review Meeting & Attendees (via Teams) schedule within 48 hours of the incident hold meeting within two weeks of incident send calendar invite to Review Mtg Attendees Subject line of invite: Level X Incident – Incident Type – Group Level 1 (Optional) • Project Team & Executive • Regional Director • District/Group Safety Manager Level 2 – Level 1 plus: • District Manager & Group Manager • Paul Levin Level 3 - Level 2 plus: • Mike Hoover, CEO
676. Start the review meeting with a discussion on Beliefs that were relevant to the incident:
Reference document
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
677. Review Meeting Date & Time
Date time
678. Review Meeting Attendees
People
679. Additional Notes/Comments/Write-in Attendees
Text Long
680. Finish the review meeting with a discussion on Actions that our team will take (in addition to other causal factors and corrective actions that were identified)
Reference document
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
40. Sundt Leadership - Incident Review Meeting
click to collapse/expand
Incident Review Meeting & Attendees (via Teams) schedule within 48 hours of the incident hold meeting within two weeks of incident send calendar invite to Review Mtg Attendees Subject line of invite: Level X Incident – Incident Type – Group Level 1 (Optional) • Project Team & Executive • Regional Director • District/Group Safety Manager Level 2 – Level 1 plus: • District Manager & Group Manager • Paul Levin Level 3 - Level 2 plus: • Mike Hoover, CEO
681. Start the review meeting with a discussion on Beliefs that were relevant to the incident:
Reference document
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
682. Review Meeting Date & Time
Date time
683. Review Meeting Attendees
People
684. Additional Notes/Comments/Write-in Attendees
Text Short
685. Finish the review meeting with a discussion on Actions that our team will take (in addition to other causal factors and corrective actions that were identified)
Reference document
Note: saving JSON stores file names only; submit handling can be connected to SharePoint, Power Automate, or another endpoint.
41. Revision Log
click to collapse/expand
686. Input details on what was edited... Provide the date of changes and list the changes that were made. Add to this section as additional updates are made to the report (don‘t delete previous revision details). Examples of revisions to detail: Added attachments, Corrected errors, Documenting incident review meeting, Re-classifying the incident, Updating data related to worker compensation, etc.
Text Long
Input details on what was edited... Provide the date of changes and list the changes that were made. Add to this section as additional updates are made to the report (don't delete previous revision details). Examples of revisions to detail: Added attachments Corrected errors Documenting incident review meeting Re-classifying the incident Updating data related to worker compensation etc
42. Insurance / Claims Info
click to collapse/expand
687. Incident will be filed as a claim with:
List Radio
SLIP
CCIP
OCIP
n/a
688. What is the insurance carrier?
Text Short
689. Claim Number
Text Short
690. Comments regarding insurance
Text Short
691. Advanced Injury Classification Options
List Checkbox
Permanent Transfer or Termination
Permanent Disability
692. Email claims report
Button
Workflow action placeholder.
693. Generate 301 Report for Party 1
Button
Workflow action placeholder.
694. Generate 301 Report for Party 2
Button
Workflow action placeholder.